On Friday 11 May 2007 19:01:51 James Keenan wrote:
> I googled the archives of our mailing list and found no matches for
> 'pod_todo'. So apparently there was no on-list discussion of this
> test before it was committed to trunk. Given how many files it finds
> defective, shouldn't there h
On Friday 11 May 2007 21:26:42 Mike Mattie wrote:
> I am very interested in chromatic's pheme language. I have been reading
> through the code and looking at your TODO list. I thought I would tackle
> some of the easier issues to get a handle on PIR and help out a bit.
Great!
> questions:
>
> 1.
Hello,
I am very interested in chromatic's pheme language. I have been reading through
the code
and looking at your TODO list. I thought I would tackle some of the easier
issues
to get a handle on PIR and help out a bit.
questions:
1. Are you targetting r5 or r6 ? I think r6 would be a better
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #42929]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42929 >
Last night, I ran 'make test' and everything was cool. Tonight, I
ran 'make test' and
On 5/11/07, Alek Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whew. Thanks for looking over my giant patch :). I've split the original
patch into three parts - testing, specs, and code, and rebased it on
r18494. I've also cut out the code that modified the implementation of
invoke() in the old object sys
On Thursday 03 May 2007 03:06:43 Andrew Shitov wrote:
> What is nedded is a very simple step:
Contributors.
-- c
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
> Well, I saw some patches [1] floating by which did remove
> PObj_bufstart_external_FLAG. This flag was needed to sync the malloc-based
> allocators with parrots (and COWs) understanding of a 'not owned' / external
> buffer/string memory resou
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > I was about to post a patch adding those functions in, but I see that
> > you're in the middle of a much more thorough review than I had attempted,
> > so my patch isn't going to apply anymore, and would probably b
Am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2007 23:07 schrieb Andrew Dougherty:
> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > Ok, I've got it compiling, at least. I'll let it run tests overnight and
> > submit a cleaned-up patch tomorrow. I've gone back and reviewed the
> > alignment issue and think I have impleme
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> But when I read STRING_IS_EMPTY() I stop and wonder "right, how?" and
> stop to look up what it expands to. Which one does need to do, if one
> is chasing down a bug. (Because with a bug, things *aren't* working as
> at least one of the designer or impl
On 5/11/07, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/07, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:33:41AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> >
> > On May 9, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> > >So, !s->strlen does scan as quickly and easily.
> > >
> >
> > To
# New Ticket Created by "Alek Storm"
# Please include the string: [perl #42919]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42919 >
Because PIR can't tell the difference between invoking an object PMC and
invoking a sub
12 matches
Mail list logo
