From: Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:12:57 -0700
Alek Storm wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Surely you are not suggesting that any random "add_method" should
>> require creating a new class? Did you mean "add_attribute"
Patches applied; closing ticket.
Applied to trunk in r18157
Also, in r18158 applied some small changes in docs/configuration.pod to point
to
Parrot::Configure::Step::List as new location for list of configuration steps
used in Configure.pl.
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 05:40, Alek Storm wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, setting :vtable without setting :method makes a great deal of
> > sense, if you want to override a low-level vtable operation without
> > adding a named method to the class.
Hi,
Larry Wall wrote:
> Looks like some kind of resource exhaustion or lockup, possibly with
> the embedded/tunneled Perl 5, but it's hard to guess without more
> information like OS, locale, etc. most of which would be supplied by:
>
> pugs -V
> perl -V
> env
>
> If you provide that
Looks like some kind of resource exhaustion or lockup, possibly with
the embedded/tunneled Perl 5, but it's hard to guess without more
information like OS, locale, etc. most of which would be supplied by:
pugs -V
perl -V
env
If you provide that sort of info, we can compare with our ow
On 4/10/07, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 02 April 2007, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 05:06:34AM +0300, Shlomi Fish <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hi Marc!
> >
> > May I forward my reply to the list?
>
> Yes, you may. Sorry for replying probably too late, tha
Hi,
for a few weeks now I haven't been able to complete a single "make
smoke" in the pugs repository.
The last test producing an output is:
t/builtins/strings/uc.t
# Actual: ß
at that point there are no more messages for ~ 10 minutes, and there are
instances of pugs running, one after the ne
On 4/11/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, setting :vtable without setting :method makes a great deal of
sense, if you want to override a low-level vtable operation without
adding a named method to the class.
Allison
Just use the :anon flag. It was designed for this. Vt
chromatic wrote:
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 18:51, Shlomi Fish wrote:
(Although it seems the most interesting promises made by parrot - fast
typeless code for example - are not going to be delivered, too).
Hmmm I haven't been closely following Parrot.
Despite this menti
Toronto Perlmongers are pleased to announce Hackathon Toronto, a one-
day, almost-spur-of-the-moment hackathon, to be held Saturday, April
28, 2007.
A hackathon is a gathering of free and open source software
developers reflecting the joy of collective hacking. Building on the
tradition o
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 18:51, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > (Although it seems the most interesting promises made by parrot - fast
> > typeless code for example - are not going to be delivered, too).
> Hmmm I haven't been closely following Parrot.
Despite this mention, this thread is off-topic fo
Alek Storm wrote:
On 4/11/07, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like this one, but I also have another alternative. First, make all
class-modification code (add_method, remove_attribute, etc) return a
PMC*. Whenever one of these methods is called on a class, the class
is clon
Alek Storm (via RT) wrote:
This patch makes the :vtable sub pragma imply the :method pragma,
which seems like common sense to me, since using :vtable without
:method doesn't make much sense, and vtable overrides are called as
methods from C anyway. Using :vtable and :method explicitly still
wor
On Monday 02 April 2007, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 05:06:34AM +0300, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hi Marc!
> >
> > May I forward my reply to the list?
>
> Yes, you may. Sorry for replying probably too late, thanks for asking
> first!
>
OK. Replying to two differe
# New Ticket Created by "Alek Storm"
# Please include the string: [perl #42430]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42430 >
This patch makes the :vtable sub pragma imply the :method pragma,
which seems like commo
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 00:25 schrieb Allison Randal:
3) Modify the core PMC implementation so it tracks information about
which the different containers (registers, temporary variables,
namespace entries, etc.) that hold a particular PMC, and which
particular containe
17 matches
Mail list logo
