Map on a multislice

2007-01-25 Thread Joe Gottman
When you call map on a multislice, does it do deep or shallow iteration? I can see uses for both of these: my @multislice = ([1,2], [3,4, 5]); my @dims = map :shallow [EMAIL PROTECTED] @multislice; # Want (2, 3) my @changed_slice = map :deep {2 * $_ + 1} @multislice; # Want ([3, 5], [7, 9, 11

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r13539 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2007-01-25 Thread larry
Author: larry Date: Thu Jan 25 13:54:46 2007 New Revision: 13539 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod Log: (forgot to delete example line) Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod == --- doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r13538 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2007-01-25 Thread larry
Author: larry Date: Thu Jan 25 13:50:47 2007 New Revision: 13538 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod Log: Obsoleted block initializer syntax. Mention div and mod. Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod ===

Re: __init vs. __init_pmc

2007-01-25 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 06:23 schrieb Matt Diephouse: > > This change is just adding more mess to object construction and argument > > passing. > > > > I've made several attempts to unify object construction with new calling > > convs > > but no one seems to be listening :-( > > That was a c

[perl #41323] [CAGE] convert C to C

2007-01-25 Thread Jerry Gay via RT
works great here on win32--ticket closed. ~jerry

Fwd: [perl #41323] [CAGE] convert C to C

2007-01-25 Thread Paul Cochrane
On 24/01/07, Nuno Carvalho via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, On Tue Jan 23 09:49:57 2007, particle wrote: > in november, there was a big cleanup of the different spellings of > C, hovewer, anything labelled C was missed. all > references should be modified to C. > ~jerry Here's a patch