[svn:perl6-synopsis] r13498 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-12-22 Thread larry
Author: larry Date: Fri Dec 22 20:29:46 2006 New Revision: 13498 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod Log: Attempts to simplify and rationalize smartmatch semantics. Run-time semantics of ~~ are now severely limited; no recursion to ~~ is used, and final fall

Re: Building Parrot::Embed on Windows XP / Visual C++

2006-12-22 Thread chromatic
On Friday 22 December 2006 12:54, Ron Blaschke wrote: > The necessary change is: > > > $ svn diff include/parrot/extend.h > Index: include/parrot/extend.h > === > --- include/parrot/extend.h (revision 16218) > +++ include/par

Re: Building Parrot::Embed on Windows XP / Visual C++

2006-12-22 Thread Ron Blaschke
chromatic wrote: > On Friday 22 December 2006 11:08, Ron Blaschke wrote: >> There are three steps necessary (four using VC8). >> >> 1) Two additional functions need to be exported. >> Parrot_register_pmc >> Parrot_unregister_pmc > > In some .def file somewhere, or marked somehow in the so

Re: Building Parrot::Embed on Windows XP / Visual C++

2006-12-22 Thread chromatic
On Friday 22 December 2006 11:08, Ron Blaschke wrote: > I have managed to build Parrot::Embed on Windows/VC8, and judging from > the test output it works. There are two warnings, but I guess those are > no problem? > > $ ./Build test > t\interpok 1/31Parrot VM: Can't stat no file here

Building Parrot::Embed on Windows XP / Visual C++

2006-12-22 Thread Ron Blaschke
I have managed to build Parrot::Embed on Windows/VC8, and judging from the test output it works. There are two warnings, but I guess those are no problem? $ ./Build test t\interpok 1/31Parrot VM: Can't stat no file here, code 2. error:imcc:syntax error, unexpected IDENTIFIER

Re: Assertions and MMD (on Windows XP)

2006-12-22 Thread Ron Blaschke
Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2006 20:24 schrieb Ron Blaschke: >> - The assertion seems to check that the lowest two bits of a function >> pointer are zero. Why's that? > > That's a bigger hack to discern function from PMC pointers in that table. > That > hack and the whole

Re: [perl #39802] [PATCH] [CAGE] turning up the warnings levels in gcc as much as we can

2006-12-22 Thread Kevin Tew
I believe it was GCC 4.0.1 on OS X. Kevin Paul Cochrane via RT wrote: Kevin, Thanks for the patch! I've managed to apply it (with some changes), however the following warning flags don't work with my gcc (3.4.5): #. "-Wfatal-errors " #. "-Wmissing-field-initializers