Author: larry
Date: Fri Sep 15 18:48:48 2006
New Revision: 12090
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
repairing some splat damage
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
At 4:26 PM -0700 9/15/06, Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: As I recall, we're allowed to put absolutely any characters we want
: in an identifier if it is a delimited identifier rather than a
: bareword identifier.
I have no clue what you mean by
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: As I recall, we're allowed to put absolutely any characters we want
: in an identifier if it is a delimited identifier rather than a
: bareword identifier.
I have no clue what you mean by 'delimited identifier'. Are you referring
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2006-09-15 16:50 (-0500):
> > > To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> > > postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> > > and the like. (And also giving us a general way of isolating the
> > > method name from the .*
At 4:55 PM -0500 9/15/06, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
So, we discussed making -e a real method, which would imply that
> identifiers can begin with -.
As a bit of a tangent, occasionally I wish that we could use - in
identifiers instead o
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> So, we discussed making -e a real method, which would imply that
> identifiers can begin with -.
As a bit of a tangent, occasionally I wish that we could use - in
identifiers instead of _. I'd rather type $some-long-name than
$some_long_na
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:28:18PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-15 14:03 (-0700):
> > To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> > postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> > and the like. (And also giving us a general way of is
Juerd skribis 2006-09-15 23:26 (+0200):
> Randal L. Schwartz skribis 2006-09-15 9:15 (-0700):
> > The thing that CGI.pm does is put in one place everything you need for a
> > simple web form. And there's an amazing number of applications for
> > this... putting a "contact us" page on an otherwise
Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-15 14:03 (-0700):
> To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> and the like. (And also giving us a general way of isolating the
> method name from the .* variants, not to mention
Randal L. Schwartz skribis 2006-09-15 9:15 (-0700):
> The thing that CGI.pm does is put in one place everything you need for a
> simple web form. And there's an amazing number of applications for
> this... putting a "contact us" page on an otherwise static site comes to mind
> immediately.
Yes,
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: 1. Get rid of it entirely. Normal methods and/or "use Shell" fill the gap.
: 2. Install it as a prefix op, not as a postfix op. To get to $_, write
:-e $_ explicitly.
: 3. Install these as prefix ops, and as postfix ops, but not as a gene
Aaron Sherman skribis 2006-09-15 15:28 (-0400):
> I didn't see this going back, sorry if I missed someone sending the mail.
Sorry. I promised to do it, but have so far lacked tuits and more or
less forgot all about it. Thanks for bringing it up!
> There was a discussion on IRC on Sept 9th about t
> "Andy" == Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, David Cantrell wrote:
>> I wonder how many people really use the HTML-generating bits of CGI.pm?
Andy> I'd guess a lot, since they are prominently documented in the CGI.pm
Andy> documentation and are used exten
I didn't see this going back, sorry if I missed someone sending the mail.
There was a discussion on IRC on Sept 9th about the -X filetest
operators between at least audreyt, Juerd, myself and markstos. The
problem with these operators was that they conflicted in some cases with
the parsing of
Hi,
Today I played a bit with calculating the 44th Mersenne prime, which is of
course using BigInt's. I discovered that my installed GMP 4.1.1 segfaulted
during multiplication (it was *not* a parrot problem ;). I compiled &
installed a recent GMP version and all went fine.
But: below [1] is the
David Brunton wrote:
Aaron Sherman wrote:
IMHO, the golden rule of programming languages should be: if you
need a namespace, create one.
Is there any reason these "meta" methods could not be part of some
default function package like Math::Basic and Math::Trig? The
package could be called
Author: larry
Date: Fri Sep 15 08:38:58 2006
New Revision: 12006
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
smartlinkable discussion of bindables on while and repeat while
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
-
On 9/14/06, Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having had some prior experience in tackling this problem (eg,
CGI::Portable), I will endeavour to work on / help with the Perl 6
analogy to HTTP::Request/Response, so to replace the use of
corresponding aspects of CGI.pm.
I really like thi
Thanks, applied, with one minor tweak.
On Sep 15, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Nuno Carvalho via RT wrote:
Hi again,
Sorry, there was a problem with the last diff. Here's the most updated
patch, attached to this file, please igore the previous patch. Sorry
again.
Best regards,
./smash
On 9/15/06, Nuno
Hi again,
Sorry, there was a problem with the last diff. Here's the most updated
patch, attached to this file, please igore the previous patch. Sorry
again.
Best regards,
./smash
On 9/15/06, Nuno Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
Added some more simple tests to file 't/compilers/j
Hi again,
Added some more simple tests to file 't/compilers/json/to_parrot.t'
related to backslashing testing. All the new tests pass. Attached to
this message you can find the patch file.
Best regards,
./smash
Index: t/compilers/json/to_parrot.t
Am Donnerstag, 14. September 2006 02:54 schrieb Karl Forner:
> Hello,
>
> So I propose a new implementation that solve the bugs, and that is linear
> in space and time, and hopefully produce
> an optimal list of moves. It is to be found in the second patch.
Great. Applied as r14621.
> We have two
Am Freitag, 15. September 2006 01:42 schrieb Karl Forner:
> But by looking in other tests and in the Parrot::Test, it seems that the
> canonical way
> of running a PIR script is through the example_output_is() function.
> BUT this function does not take any arguments for Parrot.
I'd subclass Parro
23 matches
Mail list logo
