Re: clarifying the spec for 'ref'

2006-08-27 Thread Richard Hainsworth
With regard to the 'square' 'isa' 'rectangle' or vice versa question, surely it is for the programmer to decide depending on the situation. Though the problem is how to define criteria for trapping problems at compile time. Regarding classes and roles, and in fact multiple inheritance in gene

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r11504 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-08-27 Thread larry
Author: larry Date: Sun Aug 27 22:52:36 2006 New Revision: 11504 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod Log: Clarification on syntactic mapping of and to ('a','b') and ('c'). Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod

LLVM and C99 and classic Mac OS (Re: LLVM and HLVM)

2006-08-27 Thread Joshua Juran
On Aug 22, 2006, at 5:52 PM, John Siracusa wrote: Has anyone looked at LLVM lately? http://llvm.org/ I discovered it a few years ago. My personal interest is in the portable C back end, so I can use the g++ compiler front end and send the output through CodeWarrior or MPW compilers, whos

multi subs with identical signatures: should be a warning ?

2006-08-27 Thread Mark Stosberg
First, what's the recommended reference for learning how dispatching to the right 'multi' sub is resolved. ? I'd like to know the expected behavior in this case: multi sub foo () { say "b: " } multi sub foo () { say "a: " } foo(); I would expect it would throw an error or at least a warning, sin

Weekly Perl 6 mailing list summary for August 20-26, 2006

2006-08-27 Thread Ann Barcomb
This week on the Perl 6 mailing lists "My school's punch card machines were in the same room as the TRS-80 Model I ("THE COMPUTER ROOM"). These kids today with their hula hoops and fax machines and intarwebs..." -- Chip Salzenberg, arguing in *favor* of lines in excess of 80

Re: Same-named arguments

2006-08-27 Thread Mark J. Reed
On 8/26/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mostly, it's that func('&x' => 1) requires a bit too much typing, and also makes it hard for func() to change its signature later on to accept things other than Code. Allow me to make an immodest proposal. Have named parameter passing look lik

Re: Same-named arguments

2006-08-27 Thread Michael Snoyman
Mostly, it's that func('&x' => 1) requires a bit too much typing, and also makes it hard for func() to change its signature later on to accept things other than Code. I was discussing this with a friend of mine (Eric Livak), and he suggested making the sigil on the name optional for disambigua