Darren Duncan wrote:
>>Also, I don't agree with the notion of a "header" of each relation. It
>>has a type for each tuple item, sure, but "header" just sounds like the
>>sort of thing you want in a ResultSet, not a Relation.
>>Sam.
>>
>>
>A relation's heading is essentially the definition of t
At 11:34 -0400 5/7/06, David K Storrs wrote:
>Hmmm...This doesn't seem to have particularly grabbed the popular imagination
>among the Perl6 crowd.
I'm a lurker here, mostly interested in keeping perl 6 usable for mathematics
and physics, but unable to keep up with most of the things I read.
W
Hmmm...This doesn't seem to have particularly grabbed the popular
imagination among the Perl6 crowd. Let me ask something a little
more concrete and see if that gets us to ignition, otherwise it's
probably not feasible.
Assume that I'm going to create, host, and maintain a small website
