On Feb 20, 2006, at 16:21, Karl Forner wrote:
I was expecting this kind of answer (Just Do It) ;-)
Where/How could I add this kind of FAQ ?
Write a draft, post it here for comments. Then polish it up and if it
looks good, one of us will commit it.
What you add may fit as a patch to docs/g
Matisse Enzer wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2006, at 7:57 AM, David Steinbrunner wrote:
>
>> ... that give the ability to ask for the current kb/s or the like.
>
> I think you'll have to roll your own, but you might get help from the
> various NetPacket::* classes, such as
>NetPacket::TCP
Thanks f
On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
Make sure you verify that all files in the distro are readable. Reject
if the permissions are bogus. Recently we had an increasig number of
distros that had absurd permissions.
This reminds me - it doesn't seem like Module::Build allows on
On Feb 17, 2006, at 7:57 AM, David Steinbrunner wrote:
... that give the ability to ask for the current kb/s or the like.
I think you'll have to roll your own, but you might get help from the
various NetPacket::* classes, such as
NetPacket::TCP
-
Patrick clarified:
At any rate, I find that having a subpattern capture base its
index on the highest index of all of the previous alternation
branches is easy to understand and works well in practice. It can
also be easily changed with another alias if needed.
I strongly agree, and would be
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #38598]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38598 >
Hi there,
The old PIR subroutine attributes ("method", "@MULTI", "@MAIN", "@LOAD",
"@IMM
I've spent a lot of time looking for something that would work(and
found some stuff that documentation seemed to say should work but
didn't for me), and on darwin, that's the only way I know how, either
that or a static parrot. The only other option I can think of that
would perhaps do the tri
Is there some reason that this can't be a -L flag passed to CC? IMHO -
it's bad policy to go littering makefile with env variable declaration
as the effect is global until the end of the makefile.
-J
--
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:40:24PM -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> It was working on 11676, and I
It was working on 11676, and I got it to build with 11686. But I
notice one problem: "Library not loaded:
/usr/local/lib/libparrot.dylib"
On darwin, if you want a shared parrot, you must set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
to include parrot's blib/lib.
For tcsh(os x default), it'd be "setenv DYLD_LIBRARY
And what about Null? And if they're not equal, what effect would that
have on sorting? Although for sorting, I guess that NaN != NaN would
have the some issue, but undef values in an array are more likely.
On Feb 20, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
Can we get a design descisi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:03:59AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:44, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >What happened to the factorial PASM example? It seems to have
> >disappeared and it hasn't re-appeared as a PIR example either.
>
> It used bogus high numbers beyond
On 2/21/06, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 9:56, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> >
> >> P.S
> >> I suppose that I'm not the only one willing to help facing this
> >> difficulty.
> >> Maybe a tutorial or a FAQ could attract more contributors ?
> >>
> > Yes.
>
> In fa
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:28, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >Is this really worth doing? Since profiling flags are compiler
> >specific
> >isn't it better to just let them be set as additional CFLAGS?
>
> How do I add to CFLA
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:01:11AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:25, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >This flag is in use by the inter::exp step but it's not doing much.
> >Should this flag be kept or not?
>
> I'd remove it,
The whole step or just the flag?
-J
--
I apologize for my probably naive question...
Trying to decipher t/pmc/array.t, I began wondering what happens if you set
a negative length to an array.
It lead me to array.pmc::set_integer_native, which just forwards its size
argument to list.c::list_set_length
without any check.
list_set_leng
On Feb 20, 2006, at 9:56, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
P.S
I suppose that I'm not the only one willing to help facing this
difficulty.
Maybe a tutorial or a FAQ could attract more contributors ?
Yes.
In fact, this may be the best place you can start, even if it's only
in the form of "he
On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:44, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
What happened to the factorial PASM example? It seems to have
disappeared and it hasn't re-appeared as a PIR example either.
It used bogus high numbers beyond int32 range and was just broken.
leo
On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:28, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
Is this really worth doing? Since profiling flags are compiler
specific
isn't it better to just let them be set as additional CFLAGS?
How do I add to CFLAGS from the perl Configure.pl command?
leo
On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:25, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
This flag is in use by the inter::exp step but it's not doing much.
Should this flag be kept or not?
I'd remove it,
leo
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38597]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38597 >
r11684
make realclean
CXX='ccache g++-4.0'
CC='ccache gcc-4.0'
/usr/bin/perl Configure.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:06:36AM +1100, Sisyphus wrote:
> Yes, /usr/local/lib is already in /etc/ld.so.conf.
Perhaps you need to run `ldconfig` as root.
> $LD_LIBRARY_PATH is initially empty. If I don't add '/usr/local/lib' to it,
> then when I run 'parrot hello.pir', I get (transcribed):
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Perl 6 Internals"
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Building parrot-0.4.1 on Win32
> On 2/20/06, Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh one other thing ...
What happened to the factorial PASM example? It seems to have
disappeared and it hasn't re-appeared as a PIR example either.
-J
--
No one ever made any actualy attempt to impliment the build in scons,
makepp, etc. and since we're moving towards Configure in PASM/miniparrot
I'm going to close out this bug.
-J
--
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 29 18:22:10 2004]:
>
>
> This code:
>
> new P0, .Undef
> new P1, .Undef
> eq P0, P1, L1
> print "not "
> L1: print "ok\n"
> end
>
> prints "not ok". Should it? If Parrot considers every Undef PMC to
> be distinct, it's going to ma
> [coke - Sun Aug 15 13:41:43 2004]:
>
> Add profiling build options
>
> (From the TODO file)
>
>
Is this really worth doing? Since profiling flags are compiler specific
isn't it better to just let them be set as additional CFLAGS?
-J
--
This flag is in use by the inter::exp step but it's not doing much.
Should this flag be kept or not?
-J
--
Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd still like such a thing to be visible in some way. Of course
> >you're going to happily skip tests that require a database if you don't
> >have DBI_DSN set.
> Not necesarily... it all depends on how important it is to you. I see
> some potential
On Feb 20, 2006, at 18:25, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
Is there a performance penalty for having these methods?
No, just a bit of more code size. Well, looks like compiler writers
wants these methods, so we'll keep 'em.
leo
Now 100% skips, THAT could potentially be interesting, or maybe TODOs. But
then I don't necesarily know why it would be worthy of a different result
code.
Is there metadata stored apart from these result codes? If so it
might be useful to just store the statistics on skips. Assuming this
Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly is that it might turn an otherwise normal result into something
> else, with no clear rule. It makes a judgement call that some level of
> testing is good or bad, which isn't really the place of an installer to
> call.
>
> The reason Kwalitee ha
Karl Forner schrieb:
Hi all,
I'd really like to try helping developing Perl6 and Parrot, I subscribed to
the mailing-list, read some docs, got and compiled
parrot via svn (in a vmware-played ubuntu ;-) ).
Welcome Karl.
But it is not obvious to see where to begin, and where I can be usefu
Bob Rogers schrieb:
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:55:03 +0100
in order to store the contents of a PMC into a boolean array? What do I
et al. I think, if you use a BooleanArray with compact storage you are
knowing why and don't need automatic conver
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:55:03 +0100
*) I don't think that *BooleanArray should support:
set P0[0], 3.2
set P0[1], "foo"
set P0[2], P1
So I would need to do
set I1, P1
set P0[2], I1
in order to store the cont
Leo~
On 2/20/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *) the resizable variant is heavily borked WRT allocation size
> fixes welcome
>
> *) I don't think that *BooleanArray should support:
>
>set P0[0], 3.2
>set P0[1], "foo"
>set P0[2], P1
>
> nor
>
>set N0, P[0]
>.
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #38594]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38594 >
PASM/PIR source line info is off by one (at least) on several instructions.
Please
Syed Uzair Aqeel wrote:
> pugs-tmp-4928.hs:5:2: Not in scope: `setCatchSigwinch'
> Substitution pattern not terminated at (eval 12) line 1.
Does Makefile.PL die right there, or does it go on and write a Makefile?
If the latter, you should be able to just continue "make; make install".
Audrey
s
*) the resizable variant is heavily borked WRT allocation size
fixes welcome
*) I don't think that *BooleanArray should support:
set P0[0], 3.2
set P0[1], "foo"
set P0[2], P1
nor
set N0, P[0]
...
et al. I think, if you use a BooleanArray with compact storage you are
knowing why
Folks, developers, countrymen,
the next release will go out soon (very likely this Wed), which means:
* no more feature changes to parrot core, config, libs
* bug fixes, documentation updates are very welcome as well as:
* test results, smoke and PLATFORMS updates
Thanks,
leo
Barbie wrote:
> > 12. System is incompatible with the package.
> > Linux::, Win32::, Mac:: modules. Irreconcilable differences.
>
> Not sure how you would cover this, but point 12 seems to possibly fit.
> POSIX.pm is created for the platform it's installed on. A recent package
> I was testing,
Regarding the blow, I may have been a little unclear on the layout of
the points.
The first line is the name of the error.
Following lines are meant to provide details to help clarify what it means.
Barbie wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:22:20PM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote:
2. Incompatible p
Hi all,
I'd really like to try helping developing Perl6 and Parrot, I subscribed to
the mailing-list, read some docs, got and compiled
parrot via svn (in a vmware-played ubuntu ;-) ).
But it is not obvious to see where to begin, and where I can be useful.
My main objective is to have a fast, rel
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:36:27AM +, Barbie wrote:
> > 12. System is incompatible with the package.
> > Linux::, Win32::, Mac:: modules. Irreconcilable differences.
>
> Not sure how you would cover this, but point 12 seems to possibly fit.
> POSIX.pm is created for the platform it's insta
Moin,
On Monday 20 February 2006 04:20, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> (Andreas J. Koenig) wrote:
> >> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:22:20 +1100, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> said:
> > >
> > > 1. Broken or corrupt packaging.
> > > A bad tarball, MANIFEST files missing.
> >
> > Make sur
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:22:20PM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote:
>
> 2. Incompatible packaging.
> Packaging unwraps, but missing files for the testing scheme.
You may want to split this into a result that contains no test suite
at all (UNKNOWN) and one that has missing files according to the
M
On 2/20/06, Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh one other thing on Linux I had to add (the standard location)
> /usr/local/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I've not had to do that before ... and
> the README suggests that I shouldn't have to do it wrt parrot. It says:
>
> "But please note th
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Worthington"
.
.
> So
> I guess one answer is to try the latest Parrot, either from SVN or by
> downloading a snapshot:
> http://svn.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/
>
Thanks for the reply, Jonathan. A few things came up and I've not been able
to get back u
47 matches
Mail list logo
