HaloO,
0 .. 5 == ( 0, 1, 2, 3, 4)
Hmm, and 0..5.1 == (0,1,2,3,4,5) to "rescue" the end.
--
HaloO,
Michele Dondi wrote:
IMHO the former is much more useful and common. Mathematically (say, in
combinatorics or however dealing with integers) when I happen to have to
do with a set of $n elements chances are to a large extent that it is
either 0..$n or 1..$n; 0..$n may lead to confusion
TSa:
> Ruud H.G. van Tol:
>> Not at all: they just overlap at 0.
>
> OK, to me this spoils regularity. Like 'ab ' ~ ' xy'
> becoming 'ab xy' is at least surprising, if not outright wrong.
> That is
>
> (~$x).chars + (~$y).chars == +((~$x) ~ (~$y))
>
> should always hold. Same thing for list co
HaloO,
Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
Not at all: they just overlap at 0.
OK, to me this spoils regularity. Like 'ab ' ~ ' xy'
becoming 'ab xy' is at least surprising, if not outright wrong.
That is
(~$x).chars + (~$y).chars == +((~$x) ~ (~$y))
should always hold. Same thing for list concatenat
The last (and never done correctly) relict of old calling conventions...
Technically an excpetion is kind of an object with some info (TODO) and
the exception handler is a (limited) continuation:
pmclass Exception_Handler extends Continuation ... # see classes/
Throwing an exception is
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #37760]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37760 >
imcc has a lot of structure items, which are quite similar. All these
consist of an
On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:08, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Now fixed in r10176, thanks!
Wow, that is fast, thank you.
Pm
leo
