Quick question...
I've been looking through inter_run and extend to see how to pass
arguments to a parrot method/function from C, but all the prototypes
that I've seen have '...' or 'va_list' to accept the arguments.
If I don't know what the arguments or their respective types are at
compile
On Oct 30, 2005, at 1:17, Matt Diephouse wrote:
$P2 = pir($S0)
$P2 = $P2[0] # get to the first Sub in the Eval
store_global "b", $P2
The indexed access is still a bit experimental. But anyway - why would
you "store_global" the sub, when just naming it "b" does that already?
leo
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > here's a simpler snippet that displays the same failure:
> >
> > .sub _main :main
> > .local pmc pir
> > pir = compreg "PIR"
> >
> > new_pad 0
> >
> > $S0 = <<"END_PIR"
> > .sub a
> > $P1 = find_lex 1,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 14:04:35 -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> That there will not be two slots for $:foo in Xy, but only one.
>
> But, I'm probably wrong about this as the X role may have methods that
> use $:foo in one way and the Y role may have methods that use $:foo in
> some other, inc
Luke,
On Oct 29, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
Another thing that scares me with the "utility sub" point of view
follows:
class Foo {
method process_data($data) {
$.help_process_data($data);
}
submethod help_process_data($data) {
$dat
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:28:20AM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2005 09:37 pm, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:22:40PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 22:31, Nick Glencross wrote:
> > > >There are a few cases of -1 being assigned
On 10/29/05, Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we need a mechanism that is externally (i.e. from a class interface
> point-of-view) a subroutine, but internally has the features of a method (i.e.
> has an invocant). Since it's externally sub-like but internally method-like,
> we call th
On 10/28/05, Christopher D. Malon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2005, at 11:13 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Trying to think through the VectorSpace example, and a slightly
> more complicated example (a Field), I'm starting to wonder whether
> roles need to be parameterized somehow. (Maybe th
On Oct 29, 2005, at 16:48, Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
However, there appears to be a register conflict somewhere,
because in the line "$P0 = pop args" both "$P0" and "args" end
up using the same register, thus xyz ends up displaying
A register alligator bug. I've turned off the code
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here's a simpler snippet that displays the same failure:
>
> .sub _main :main
> .local pmc pir
> pir = compreg "PIR"
>
> new_pad 0
>
> $S0 = <<"END_PIR"
> .sub a
> $P1 = find_lex 1, '$a'
> .end
> END_PIR
> $P2 = pir($S0) # using find_name to get
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #37561]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37561 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.4.21-27.0.2.elsmp
arch= i386-linux-thread-multi
cc=
In his use.perl.org journal, Luke wrote:
> To be fair, Damian responded to my query, but he didn't answer my
> question. He gave more an example of how submethods are used, rather
> than why they are used.
Subroutines are useful inside classes, for factoring class-specific
implementation detail
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Stig Brautaset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: perl6-internals@perl.org
> Betreff: patch to unbreak 'make clean'
> Datum: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:19:12 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes 'make clean' for me.
Thanks for pointing this out. Patch applied in r9623. Obv
13 matches
Mail list logo
