Okay, due to some discussion on #perl6, I'll assume that the reason my
fmap proposal was Warnocked is because a fair number of people didn't
understand it. Also, for the people who did understand, this message
includes a complete proposal for the workings of Junctions that will
fluster Damian agai
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:22:29PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
: I might have missed this somewhere in the documentation, but is Perl 6 going
: to have any documented notion of things like sequence points, undefined
: behaviour, etc?
I don't claim to be the expertest expert on sequence points, bu
For all the activity going on with CPANTS, we have nothing on
qa.perl.org that refers to it.
Can someone please write up a paragraph and a link that I can put up
on qa.perl.org's front page?
Thanks,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ cc'ed list ]
On Sep 18, 2005, at 17:52, Nicholas Dronen wrote:
Hi, Leopold:
I'm interested in contributing to Parrot development. I'm in grad school
and working 25 hours/week, so I can only afford to give a few hours
per month. Even so, I thin
David Landgren wrote:
Yeah, but I'm loathe to dedicate two separate test files merely to score
two points of Kwalitee. As it is, I'd just much rather bundle both tests
in a 00_basic.t file along with all the other standard no-brainer tests.
One option is just to forget about the two points of
[ cc'ed list ]
On Sep 18, 2005, at 17:52, Nicholas Dronen wrote:
Hi, Leopold:
I'm interested in contributing to Parrot development. I'm in grad
school
and working 25 hours/week, so I can only afford to give a few hours
per month. Even so, I think the best thing for me to do is to pick a
t
Andrew Savige wrote:
I based mine on the Test::Pod::Coverage docs:
use Test::More;
eval "use Test::Pod::Coverage 1.00";
plan skip_all => "Test::Pod::Coverage 1.00 required for testing POD coverage"
if $@;
all_pod_coverage_ok();
and scored the coverage kwalitee point...
Yeah, but I'm loat
"Leopold Toetsch (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SYNOPSIS
pbc_merge -o all.pbc a.pbc, b.pbc [, ...]
ABSTRACT
Read all given pbc files and repack the bytecode into one result pbc.
DESCRIPTION
Since r8676 parrot can (again) create a string representation of evaled
code.
compiled = c
--- David Landgren wrote:
> Seriously though, I have a module whose test suite includes Test::Pod
> and Test::Pod::Coverage, except that I use the following construct:
>
> SKIP: {
> skip( 'Test::Pod not installed on this system', 1 )
> unless do {
> eval qq{ use Test::P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Sunday 18 September 2005 11:48, David Landgren wrote:
> Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
> > http://cpants.perl.org
>
> Ooh! my kwalitee improved :) except other people's kwalitee imp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:29, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
> http://cpants.perl.org
>
> Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
> suggestions/help with 'h
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
http://cpants.perl.org
Ooh! my kwalitee improved :) except other people's kwalitee improved
more than mine :(
Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
suggestions/help wi
Hi!
Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
http://cpants.perl.org
Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
suggestions/help with 'has_changelog'.
I've also added suggestions to improve ones kwalitee. For each metric I
wrote up a short 'remedy'
13 matches
Mail list logo
