On Aug 29, 2005, at 12:35 AM, Gary Jackson wrote:
Also, a lot of little bugs have been found and squashed, and Andy
Lester has started to put some proper testing in to place.
What I'd really like is a standard typecheck.t like we have standard
pod.t. It'd look something like this:
use
I've made some significant updates to Devel::TypeCheck today in the
source code repository (svn.perl.org/modules/Devel-TypeCheck). The
most significant thing is the addition of typing for aggregate data
types. I've added another structural level to distinguish between
strings/numbers an
Yuval Kogman wrote:
Luke said he was going to sleep, so I'll point you to some chat logs
instead of letting you wait for his reply:
http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2005-08-28,Sun&sel=281#l460
Thanks for that.
Bottom line: the aim is to change the meaning.
I
In anticipation of the upcoming merge of leo-ctx5 to trunk, i was
trying to get tcl working there.
Given the tcl:
set b(c) 2
puts [array exists b]
I get the error:
wrong # args: should be "array exists arrayName"
From languages/tcl/lib/commands/array.pir, the Tcl::&array sub seems
fine, a
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 22:22:07 +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> You're going to need to find another syntax. That one already means something
> else (namely, shell-like interpolating word list).
Luke said he was going to sleep, so I'll point you to some chat logs
instead of letting you wait for hi
Luke wrote:
Now I'm going to propose a variant for circumfix:
foo(1, <<@a>>, 2);
Where the meta operator is pointing to the parentheses around the
call. Then it is easy to do my map above:
my ($val1, $val2, $val3) = foo("bar", <<1,2,3>>, "baz")
You're going to need to find another
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
oops... Can I forward our correspondence to the mailing list?
Sure. I was wondering why you took it private. :>
--Dks
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> nested_call.wrap(), maybe?
It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is for wrapping only. This
applies to super methods, delegate methods, and so forth.
--
() Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0xEBD27418 perl hacker &
/\ kung foo
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:18:42 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
>
> On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> >>nested_call.wrap(), maybe?
> >It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is for wrapping only. This
> >applies to sup
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:56:58 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> While I think your P6 code is great, I don't feel you're comparing apples to
> apples. In all your P6 examples you effectively break the autovivify step
> out
> from the other steps. You can do that in P5 too:
To me the code belo
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:18:42 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
nested_call.wrap(), maybe?
It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 09:45:02 +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Where the meta operator is pointing to the parentheses around the
> call. Then it is easy to do my map above:
>
> my ($val1, $val2, $val3) = foo("bar", <<1,2,3>>, "baz")
I think a some << and >> of the same "shape" thrown into to
While nothingmuch and I are gutting junctions and trying to find the
right balance of useful/dangerous, I'm going to propose a new way to
do autothreading that doesn't use junctions at all.
First, let me show you why I think junctions aren't good enough:
I can't extract the information that the t
Today I wrote some perl 5 code that looked like this:
my %index_by_x;
my %index_by_y;
my %index_by_z;
foreach my $thing (@things){
( $index_by_x{$thing->x_value} ||=
Set::Object->new)->insert($thing);
( $index_by_y{$thing->y_value}
Hi,
What is the "correct" way to do pass through args?
In perl 5 we would do:
sub whatever {
...
nested_call(@_);
...
}
but slurpy args are undesireable, since they are lossy:
data loss - shape of input parameters is indet
15 matches
Mail list logo
