Hi,
Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 19:16:55 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
>
>>my ($head, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) := foo();
>
> if foo returns a list of scalars >=2 this is like parameter
> unpacking:
>
> my ($head, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) = *foo();
[...]
Right, but I wanted to d
Hi,
Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 14:29:29 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
>> * @foo[$idx] := $var;
>> my @bar = @foo;
>> $var= $new_var;
>> # @foo[$idx] and $var are now $new_var, but @bar is unchanged,
>> # right?
>
> Yes, I agree. But we do need a way in the
Hi,
Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 17:38:26 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
>> ($foo, $bar)[0] =:= $foo;
>> # False (i.e. no difference to arrays) or true?
>
> I think this is true, because you can say:
>
> ($foo, $bar) = (1, 2);
>
> And more curiously:
>
> for ($foo, $bar)
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 23:29:03 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
> * What happens if @array gets spliced?
...
> @array.delete($some_index); @array[$some_index] = $some_value;
> # or
> @array[$some_index] = $some_value;
the name 'splice' implies that things are removed, replaced, and
t
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 14:29:29 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
> Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
> * @array[$out_of_bounds_index] := $var;
> # Fatal error ("Can't rebind non-existant container")?
> # Or autovivify @array[$out_of_bounds_index]?
IMHO definately autovivify
>
> * @foo[$idx] := $var;
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 19:16:55 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
>my ($head, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) := foo();
if foo returns a list of scalars >=2 this is like parameter
unpacking:
my ($head, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) = *foo();
if foo returns a scalar and an
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 17:38:26 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * my @array = ;
> @array[1] = "new";
> # Array elements are, of course, new (rw) containers.
>
> * my @array = ($foo, $bar);
>
> @array[0] =:= $foo;
> # False -- array element are new containers.
>
> @array[0]
Hi,
(sorry for me going into implementation details, but, as it's really a
language design question, I refrained from sending this to p6c.)
While trying to make the following work in PIL2JS...
my ($head, @tail) = foo();
it occured to me that this is bogus, or at least hard to implement.
Wi
Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-08-27 17:38 (+0200):
> I think these semantics are pretty clear. But what about lists?
Lists are a language thing, not a data type. List elements can be
lvalues.
> ($foo, $bar)[0] =:= $foo;
> # False (i.e. no difference to arrays) or true?
I think this can be (
Hi,
* my @array = ;
@array[1] = "new";
# Array elements are, of course, new (rw) containers.
* my @array = ($foo, $bar);
@array[0] =:= $foo;
# False -- array element are new containers.
@array[0] = $baz;
# $foo unchanged
I think these semantics are pretty clear. But what about lis
Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
> Then we wondered what should happen to array elements which are bound
> to other variables if some things happen to the array. (Of course, the
> same thoughts apply to hashes as well).
Two more questions:
* @array[$out_of_bounds_index] := $var;
# Fatal error ("Can't r
11 matches
Mail list logo