On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:08:38AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> As promised on #perl6, today I produced a drawing showing how the
> Perl 6 metamodel would work in Pugs. It aims to cover the common
> elements between Perl5, JavaScript and Haskell editions:
>
> http://pugscode.org/images/metam
Updating Data::Escape seems like a better option to me.
On Aug 12, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:37:53AM -0700, Will Coleda wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #36882]
# in the subject line of all future corr
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:37:53AM -0700, Will Coleda wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
> # Please include the string: [perl #36882]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36882 >
>
>
> Trying to glo
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay
# Please include the string: [perl #36884]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36884 >
since parrot has migrated from cvs to svn, and there's little chance
it'll migrate back, t
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #36882]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36882 >
Trying to glob empty strings causes a bus error. I would expect this
to be a match. wo
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:16:52PM +0200, TSa wrote:
: HaloO,
:
: Autrijus Tang wrote:
: >Or do you think that people should really write ::= for constants?
:
: For me that is one option if I want the parser to recognize the
: bareword pi and attach the same meaning as the literal 3.
: We have at
As promised on #perl6, today I produced a drawing showing how the
Perl 6 metamodel would work in Pugs. It aims to cover the common
elements between Perl5, JavaScript and Haskell editions:
http://pugscode.org/images/metamodel.png
I plan to draw another picture showing the time-indexd bootstra
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:52:18PM -0700, Ashley Winters wrote:
: On 8/11/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > So either we have to bifurcate the concept into "temporarily constant"
: > and "permanently constant", or we force people to distinguish with ::=
: > (or "is constant('foo')"), or
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:30:09PM +0200, TSa wrote:
: HaloO,
:
: Larry Wall wrote:
: >[..] but since sets are
: >immutable values,
:
: Does that imply they travel in $vars and are a subtype
: of Value?
I believe so.
: Is Undef of Set the Set::Empty?
I don't think so. The empty set should pro
TSa wrote:
:Pair%Hash
$Item@Array
Here I forget to mention the beautiful symmetry:
| arity
access | 1| 0..Inf
---+---+-
keyed | :Pair | %Hash
positional | $Item | @Array
Regards,
--
$TSa.greeting := "HaloO"; # mind the echo!
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
[..] but since sets are
immutable values,
Does that imply they travel in $vars and are a subtype
of Value? Is Undef of Set the Set::Empty? Is Set::Empty false?
we need only provide an alternate comparison to
the constructor, and the set itself needn't remember it. O
HaloO,
Autrijus Tang wrote:
Or do you think that people should really write ::= for constants?
For me that is one option if I want the parser to recognize the
bareword pi and attach the same meaning as the literal 3.
We have at least
my ::pi ::= 3;
my enum ; # I hope the whitespace do
* David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-12T09:10:21]
> Won't "&is_code" get called that way? Should this be:
>
> ok defined \&is_code;
No. C will do the right thing, here. Taking a reference to an
undefined sub, however, will always return a defined value: a coderef
that, when called,
Ivan Tubert-Brohman wrote:
Isn't
ok defined *::is_code{CODE};
just a convoluted way of saying
ok defined &is_code;
Won't "&is_code" get called that way? Should this be:
ok defined \&is_code;
David Golden
> Strange. You could replace the .IGLOBALS_CONFIG_HASH with it's value (6)
> (and drop the .include line) and try to track down what's wrong with:
>
> $ bin/parrot parrot-config.imc prefix
I did that - and the same with line 56 concerning iterator.pasm because that
also did not work. Afterwards i
At 10:42 11/08/2005 -0700, you wrote:
According to our records, your request regarding
"[PATCH] m4 tests compatible with Win32"
has been resolved.
the patch wasn't correctly applied.
the test fails on Win32 :
# Failed test (m4\t\builtins\010_sysval.t at line 26)
# got: ''$true'
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:47:49PM +0200, TSa wrote:
: >defined($spot); # false!?
:
: true! Even for my $spot = ::Dog because when my is evaluated the
: name ::Dog has be be bound, AUTOLOADED or by whatever means become
: available.
What does binding have to
17 matches
Mail list logo
