I've just uploaded Test::Harness 2.51_02. It turns off the timer by
default, and adds a --timer switch to prove. Please try it out and see
if all is well because I'm going to make it 2.52 tomorrow.
And now, I must go to bed so I can drive to Toronto...
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROT
> > My initial quick-glance at B::Deparse's documentation mentions
> > something about perl optimising certain constants away, which could
> > well throw a spanner into the works. Storable uses B::Deparse when
> > serialising coderefs, though, so I'm certain there's a way around
> > this.
>
> That
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:08:35AM -0400, Collin Winter wrote:
> My inital strategy for implementing this was a two-tiered approach.
> First, compare the references; if they're the same, return true, go no
> futher. If they differ, however, say if anonymous subs were thrown
> into the mix, then use
I'll chime in, as I'm the one who initially raised the idea : )
I'll start with a use-case: my initial motivation for having is_deeply
handle coderefs came up while building certain unit tests for a
rewrite of DBD::Mock. Several of the worker functions return complex
data structures -- which may c
Currently, throwing is_deeply() a code ref causes it to barf.
perl -MTest::More -wle 'print is_deeply sub {}, sub {}'
WHOA! No type in _deep_check
This should never happen! Please contact the author immediately!
# Looks like your test died before it could output anything.
is_deeply() doesn't k
I've just checked in changes to PGE that enable it to support
grammars, as well as some more built-in rules (,
, , , etc.). To create a new grammar,
just create a subclass of "PGE::Rule" and install new rules into
the new grammar's namespace:
.sub main @MAIN
load_bytecode "PGE.pbc"
Hi,
What is parrot's default method resolution order? Is it like the old
Python MRO (left-to-right, depth-first)? Is it like the new Python MRO
[1] (left-to-right, depth-first, but discard all but the last occurrence
of duplicates)?
[1] "Unifying types and classes in Python 2.2" by Guido van Ross
# New Ticket Created by Craig
# Please include the string: [perl #36385]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36385 >
Downloaded revision 8443 of Parrot to Windows XP Pro using SVN. When using
'nmake' 7.10.3077,
From: Joshua Juran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:05:35 -0400
On Jun 24, 2005, at 11:02 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
> Since Complex could also be considered a Number, but of a very
> different
> sort, it might be worth constructing the type hierarchy to reflect
> t
