On Tuesday 07 June 2005 23:41, Luke Palmer wrote:
> On 6/7/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay, I've made up my mind. The "err" option is not tenable because
> > it can cloak real exceptions, and having multiple versions of reduce is
> > simply multiplying entities without adding mu
Luke Palmer wrote:
< and > still don't make sense as reduce operators. Observe the table:
# of args | Return (type)
0 | -Inf
1 | Num (the argument)
2 | bool
... | bool
Let's look at the type of one of the many `reduce' vari
With this patch, Tcl is now failing the same two tests for me that it's been failing for leo:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/cmd_break.t 1 256 21 50.00% 2
t/cmd_con
At 01:40 PM 6/3/2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
> I have been working and thinking about improvements to the Parrot/IMCC
> optimizer for a while now. Implementing SSA is definitely at the top
> of my list, because it simplifies a lot of optimizations and makes
> some others possible. The biggest chall
On 6/7/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:41:49PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> : < and > still don't make sense as reduce operators.
>
> Yeah, I keep confusing them with min and max.
>
> : That reminds me, how are <, >, etc. defined anyway? How can we tell
> :
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:41:49PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
: < and > still don't make sense as reduce operators.
Yeah, I keep confusing them with min and max.
: That reminds me, how are <, >, etc. defined anyway? How can we tell
: them to be list-associative with each other?
Because they're a
On 6/7/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I've made up my mind. The "err" option is not tenable because
> it can cloak real exceptions, and having multiple versions of reduce is
> simply multiplying entities without adding much power. So let's allow
> an optional "identvalue" trait
All~
On 6/7/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/7/05, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/7/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > sub foo (Code $code) {
> > > my $return_to_caller = -> $ret { return $ret };
> > >
> > > $code($ret
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Juran
# Please include the string: [perl #36200]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36200 >
A 'make test' of parrot failed some tests on Linux/m68k.
Here is the contents of mycon
On 6/7/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then let's put it this way:
>
>sub foo () {
>for 0..10 {
>when 6 { return 42 }
>}
>return 26;
>}
>
> And if that didn't do it, then let's write it equivalently as:
>
>sub foo () {
>&map(->
On 6/7/05, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/7/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sub foo (Code $code) {
> > my $return_to_caller = -> $ret { return $ret };
> >
> > $code($return_to_caller);
> > return 23;
> > }
> >
> > sub bar (Code $retu
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:26:28AM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > This is an average for perl5-porters over its entire existence?
> > I don't think that it's a reputation it deserves any more. It's very a
> > very uneventful list
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> > > SV> Three cheers for Dan!
>
> Do we need to stop at 3?
>
> > In fact, at face value, t
> > I will be happy to provide 50Mb on my web space... but isn't this
> > reasonable using Juerd's space, he kindly provided those to perl6
> > things?
> >
> > See: http://feather.perl6.nl/~vkon
>
> I can offer a web space, too, for example with subdomain
> pxperl.perl6.hu. 50Mb isn't a problem, a
Hi,
Matt Fowles wrote:
> On 6/7/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sub foo (Code $code) {
>> my $return_to_caller = -> $ret { return $ret };
>>
>> $code($return_to_caller);
>> return 23;
>> }
>>
>> sub bar (Code $return) { $return(42) }
>>
>> say foo &bar; #
Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> sub foo (Code $code) {
> my $return_to_caller = -> $ret { return $ret };
>
> $code($return_to_caller);
> return 23;
> }
>
> sub bar (Code $return) { $return(42) }
>
> say foo &bar; # 42 or 23?
>
> I think
Ingo~
On 6/7/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sub foo (Code $code) {
> my $return_to_caller = -> $ret { return $ret };
>
> $code($return_to_caller);
> return 23;
> }
>
> sub bar (Code $return) { $return(42) }
>
> say foo &bar; # 42 or 23?
>
> I th
Hi,
sub foo (Code $code) {
my $return_to_caller = -> $ret { return $ret };
$code($return_to_caller);
return 23;
}
sub bar (Code $return) { $return(42) }
say foo &bar; # 42 or 23?
I think it should output 42, as the return() in the pointy
block $return_to_calle
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > Nick Glencross wrote:
> >
> > > I fear that there may be some pointer alignment problems in hash because
> > > I'm
> > > getting hangs which seem to be linked to finding strings in hash tables.
> > > (That's pure conjecture)
> >
> > I'm not awa
Okay, I've made up my mind. The "err" option is not tenable because
it can cloak real exceptions, and having multiple versions of reduce is
simply multiplying entities without adding much power. So let's allow
an optional "identvalue" trait on operators. If it's there, reduce
can use it. If it'
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [iso-8859-1] François PERRAD wrote:
> I work with MinGW, ActivePerl & cmd.exe.
> I introduced the configuration variable slash_exec.
> On all platform 'slash' == 'slash_exec'
> except with MinGW where :
> slash => '/' (need by mingw32-make)
> 'slash_exec' => '
I didn't realize I was still on this list (which I'm going to take
care of in a bit) but since I'm seeing this...
At 5:07 PM -0700 6/6/05, Edward Peschko wrote:
But it still strikes me as odd. I saw some tension in the perl6
mailing lists, but
nothing that would have suggested that *this* woul
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > SV> Three cheers for Dan!
Do we need to stop at 3?
> In fact, at face value, the perl6 mailing lists seemed freshly absent from
> strife.
> They are IMO ten ti
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 Larry Wall wrote:
> I'll be glad to point out that one of the most *irritating* problems
> is people who snipe from the sidelines without having earned the
> right to do so by contributing. Dan has earned the right to carp,
> and deserves our respect for refusing to vent (muc
Jacinto S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch expands on the documentation in C,
> namely how the Emacs pasm mode should be installed. I've also made
> some additions to C which adds highlighting for pasm
> registers as well as some extended highlighting for IMCC syntax.
Thanks, applied - r8
Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch below goes on top of yours and renames it link_shared.
Thanks, applied - r8284
leo
Juerd wrote:
$y() = 7;
No, sorry, that looks to me as if $y is a reference to an lvalue sub,
not like any form of referencing of scalars.
I think it will come naturally to the C++ and Java folks. There the
accessor kind of functions is either mapped into the name get_y()
and set_y(value), or
27 matches
Mail list logo
