> I try to stick to the hectic pace at which Pugs evolves :)
>
> http://pixigreg.com/?pxperl
is it possible to have an alternative approach of just zip-packed binaries?
Also, there is mentioned some Intel compiler for better performance... how
it is supported?
For the best of my knowledge, only
Nick Glencross wrote:
Nick Glencross wrote:
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
I've nearly finished making my updates. I need some help on one aspect
though...
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005, fayland wrote:
> # exprot PUGS_EMBED='parrot'
> export PARROT_PATH='/usr/local/parrot-0.2.0'
> perl Makefile.PL
> make
> # make failed, after tons of successful Compilings, it returns
Try the parrot build tree, rather than where parrot is installed.
--
Greg Matheson, Taiwa
Nick Glencross wrote:
Nick Glencross wrote:
extend.o and nci_test.o need to be built with $(CC_SHARED) in addition
to the normal flags. What's the most straightforward way of doing this?
I've had a couple of experiments with config/gen/makefiles/root.in, but
don't know what the 'right thing'
Hi,
two quick questions:
Are multi submethods allowed?
my $x = undef;
my $y = $x.some_method;
# $y now contains an unthrown exception object, saying that undef
# doesn't .can("some_method"), right?
say $y; # Only now it dies, correct?
This is important if you have a sub which may ei
Nick Glencross wrote:
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
I've nearly finished making my updates. I need some help on one aspect
though...
extend.o and nci_test
I have made available version 0.2.1 of the "amber for
parrot" scripting language. This is a language being designed
specifically for parrot. The syntax and semantics of amber are largely
inspired by Eiffel although there's a good deal of ruby in there too
(especially the anonymous agents which work
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 17:05:13 +0100, Nick Glencross
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
> about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
> hacked Makefiles etc.
>
> Some tweaks will be needed to the Conf
As follows are what I did:
# follow the instruction of parrot/README, I download the
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/globalization/icu/downloads.jsp, and
success to install the ICU library.
# perl Configure.pl
make
make install
# now parrot is running. but it's not in my PATH. should I 'ln f
GlennH wrote:
Hello folks,
I read about the Phalanx project on the yahoo Agile Testing group and
thought I'd sign up the mailing list and skulk in the background.
Don't just skulk. Enlist!
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/
http://phalanx.kwiki.org/
jimk
Nick Glencross wrote:
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
My hacked HP-UX build now passes most tests. Wohooo!
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
Some tweaks will be needed to the Configure tests (not too many), but
I'd just like to summarise what I believe to be the 'big p
Hi,
I'll take a shot at it since no one else seems to want to. :-)
> Hope this is helpful. Corrections are welcome from anyone who spots
> any mistakes.
Thanks, it helped me!
More questions. ;) It seems to me, that the following constructs not
yet(?) implemented in Pugs. Is it true?
Built
I'll take a shot at it since no one else seems to want to. :-)
On 6/3/05, BÁRTHÁZI András <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I catch the matched elem name, and block content? I'm guessing
> that hypotetical variables can be the solution, but it says, that those
> variables should have been defin
On 6/5/05, BÁRTHÁZI András <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried it on the feather.perl6.nl machine, with pugs. Is it the
> right behaviour?
Caller-side splatted arguments aren't yet implemented in Pugs. As far
as I know, the specced behaviour is still correct.
Stuart
Hi,
No ideas?
Bye,
Andras
I'm working on a web templating system, and I'm wondering how should I
use rules?
I have these defs:
rule elem {
\< wts \: (<[a..z]>+) \/ \>
}
rule block {
\< wts \: (<[a..z]>+)\>(.*?)\< \/ wts \: $1 \>
}
I would like to execute subroutines during the e
Hi,
From the Perl6 and Parrot Essentials:
- 8< -
sub flat_hash ($first, $second) {
say "first: $first";
say "sec. : $second";
}
my %hash = (first => 1, second => 2);
flat_hash(*%hash);
- 8< -
It says, that "No compatible subroutine found". I've modyfied the
subroutine
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nick Glencross (via RT) wrote:
+if ($^O ne 'MSWin32') {
I'd much more prefer one of:
a) if $^O eq 'hpux'
b) fix the "copy" to preserve perms
Anyway, as hpux is still broken in several other places, I'll drop a
note in PLATFORMS and not apply the patch now.
On Saturday 04 June 2005 20:29, Clement Cherlin wrote:
> I actually have Linux installed on this machine, but for reasons which
> I'm not going to get into here I use Win98 for day-to-day computing. I
> therefore took it as a challenge to get Parrot to build with crufty ol'
> command.com.
I have a
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>> #define PARROT_HASH_ALIGNED_FUNCPTR 0
> Actually, where it uses this in mmd.c is actually an #ifndef which means
> that really the above line should be commented out.
The various HPUX-related changed didn't make it into the
20 matches
Mail list logo
