Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:02:41PM +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
>: # Possibility #2
>: multi sub *postcircumfix:<'[', ']'>(TiedArray $self, $index) {
>: # Body as above
>: }
> None of those are quite right, because you have to be prepar
Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two things popped up while implementing a demo version of alarm() today.
> 1. In perl5 and in most underlying libraries, alarm() has 1 second
> granularity
> 2. ..., in which you can
> pass an optional closure to alarm()
I can't say anything about the actu
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TODO items and design issues
And some more:
6) stringish MMD infix operators: concatenate, repeat
The implementation takes either two strings, or one string and an integer
repeat count. Again not much multi to dispatch IMHO.
Missing: PMC variants of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- trunk/MANIFEST(original)
> +++ trunk/MANIFESTTue Apr 19 16:51:10 2005
>@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@
> -classes/boolean.pmc []
I don't understand this change to MANIFEST. classes/boolean.pmc is for
sure used, but
$ p
Leo --
I had posted a program a while ago that generates large
fake programs for testing such things. Did that not help?
I think I still have it in my working directory if you'd
like to have a peek at it...
Regards,
-- Gregor
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 12:05 PM +0200 4/13/05, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
As
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
Python on Parrot
^^
Kevin Tew wondered what the state of pyrate was. Sam Ruby provided a
general explanation.
(I'm not on all of the lists, so this may have come out before and I j
Hi,
For who didn't noticed it yet: I've committed a memory game into
examples/cgi. As I know, this is the first Perl 6 web application. Have fun!
Bye,
Andras
Still some GC bugs kicking around that neither Leo nor I have been able to find
yet. (Note that the bug in [string] may actually be a PGE leak, as that code
uses the glob rules).
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 01:51 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:30:15PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > I was playing around with pugs's interactive mode and didn't think about
> > what I was typing. I just typed "?" out of force of semi-habit with CLI
> > tools, and to my shoc
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-04-12 through 2005-04-19
All~
Sadly, a slip of the mouse cause me to delete a partially completed
summary, so I am going to push ahead on the rewrite without a witty
intro. Feel free to make one up for yourself involving stuffed animals,
musicians, and d
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Applied the patch. with some fiddling.
> Matt: Could you check whether all changes are in?
Looks good to me. Thanks.
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
On 19 Apr 2005, at 11:40, David Cantrell wrote:
[snip]
The script that generates it doesn't change. The data that it mangles
into a module is the bit that changes.
Can you add a version number to the data?
So I'll take the suggestion of putting MMDD into a version number.
But then wasn't the
> > >> Either pmc2c.pl should be deleted or pmc2c2.pl should be renamed to
> > >> pmc2c.pl.
> >
> > > A better location might be 'build_tools/pmc2c.pl
> >
> Attached is a patch that does just that, including appropriate
> documentation changes. Note that these changes involved using 'svn rm'
> an
Bummer, forgot to attach the patch. Here it is.
capture_output_with_stderr.patch
Description: Binary data
# New Ticket Created by Ron Blaschke
# Please include the string: [perl #35043]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=35043 >
C only handles stdout, but at least on Windows the
versions of Python and ANTLR are rep
# New Ticket Created by Lambeck
# Please include the string: [perl #35042]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=35042 >
Hi all,
now that the problem concerning gmp is resolved I noticed 2 other problems:
1. antl
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:38 -0700, Francois PERRAD wrote:
> For top Makefile : conversion CVS targets to SVN.
Thanks, applied.
-- c
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:30:15PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> I was playing around with pugs's interactive mode and didn't think about
> what I was typing. I just typed "?" out of force of semi-habit with CLI
> tools, and to my shock Pugs SEGVed. Now, I realize that this wasn't
> valid input, bu
# New Ticket Created by Francois PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #35041]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=35041 >
For top Makefile : conversion CVS targets to SVN.
Francois Perrad.
svn.patch
Desc
I was playing around with pugs's interactive mode and didn't think about
what I was typing. I just typed "?" out of force of semi-habit with CLI
tools, and to my shock Pugs SEGVed. Now, I realize that this wasn't
valid input, but still... a SEGV seems like an odd response.
The really frustrating p
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:02:41PM +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
: Hi,
:
: quoting an old post from Luke (http://xrl.us/ftet):
: > Cing is going to work quite differently, from what I hear.
: > So it might be possible to overload any function to call a
: > special version when your type
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:01:48PM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
: The following is legal perl:
:
: print "$a $b $c" if ($a,$b,$c)=(1,2,3);
:
: This prints "1 2 3", but the definitions obviously aren't scoped to the
: modified statement. And a C in the modifier is a bit too late.
:
: Any reason to
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:14:04AM +0300, wolverian wrote:
: On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:00:53PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: > %num_of_lines = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
: >
: > : because the Perl 5 way would put a reference to @file in the hash.
: > : Scalar context always makes references now, from wh
Hi,
quoting an old post from Luke (http://xrl.us/ftet):
> Cing is going to work quite differently, from what I hear.
> So it might be possible to overload any function to call a
> special version when your type of array is used. You just have
> to write all the special versions.
S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> void class_init() {
> + PMC *just_a_hack;
Well, this isn't just a hack, but an offical way to register objects
within the Parrot DOD registry.
leo
Adrian Howard wrote:
On 18 Apr 2005, at 17:03, David Cantrell wrote:
Number::Phone::UK::Data - no version, this is where the .0004 comes from
though. It has no version number because the
entire file is generated from a *really* dumb
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:00:53PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> %num_of_lines = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>
> : because the Perl 5 way would put a reference to @file in the hash.
> : Scalar context always makes references now, from what I understand.
>
> Interestingly, a stored reference would track t
27 matches
Mail list logo
