Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> with 'make testr' I get a single test failure. My guess is that the string
> encoding is
> not properly written to the dumped PBC file:
Yep. That's still missing.
Thanks,
leo
Thomas Sandlaß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The opcodes for 'callmethod_MMD_3_sig "func"' and 'callmethod_MMD_n
> "func", n' are simply not there yet, right?
No. The problem is that at function call time there is no indication
that a MMD subroutine should be called. So Parrot will just do a full
Thomas Sandlaß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I missing something, but the only thing I've figured out so far is that
> Parrot uses ternary MMD for its builtin binary ops like ADD, MUL, OR, etc.
actually binary, dispatch is based on (left, right) operands.
> They are ternary to prevent a final
To avoid a warnocking,
Yup. Stopped in briefly on #parrot about 2 weeks ago, but basically MIA.
Leo is currently working on release 0.1.12.
Jesse is working on getting the TPF milestones more documented.
Regards.
Edward Peschko wrote:
hey,
just thought I'd take parrot's pulse really quick.. las
hey,
just thought I'd take parrot's pulse really quick.. last thing I heard from Dan
that
he was back (about a month ago) and haven't heard from him since. Has he since
gone
MIA again?
Ed
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #34285]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34285 >
Hi,
with 'make testr' I get a single test failure. My guess is that the string
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 12:45, Thomas Sandlaà wrote:
> Sorry, if this is the wrong list for discussing these Parrot details.
Yeah, you really want to be in p6i, not p6l. These guys think a Parrot's
just a bird that says funny things and sits on a pirate's shoulder ;-)
PS: http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/
After Dan's string patch got merged to head (thanks to Will Coleda for
sending me a diff), I've put in some more string stuff with these new
opcodes:
* charset, charsetname, find_charset
* is_whitespace, is_digit, is_wordchar, is_punctuation, is_newline
* find_whitespace, find_digit, find_wordch
HaloO Aaron,
you wrote:
Um... I think you're thinking of operator overloading, which in Parrot
actually does use the MMD facility under the hood, but MMD is nominally
a separate facility. You should glance at the PDDs, as they have far
more detail than I'm aware of.
You mean the ones in the docs/pd
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 10:34, Thomas Sandlaà wrote:
> Am I missing something, but the only thing I've figured out so far is that
> Parrot uses ternary MMD for its builtin binary ops like ADD, MUL, OR, etc.
> They are ternary to prevent a final copy or conversion of the result to the
> target regist
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 04:14:34PM -0500, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
> I hunted down the cause of the non-parsing of
> ok((2 + 3) == $five, "== (sum on lhs)");
> in 03operator.t, but am not yet up to speed in Haskell to fix it.
>
> Below is the location of the problem.
>
> The error is in Parser.hs
HaloO Aaron,
you wrote:
Is there any reason at all that 6.0 should have return MMD? I mean, it's
way-the-heck cool and all, but it became a "thing" when Parrot produced
this capability as a by-product of the way MMD was implemented in
conjunction with return continuations that doesn't mean we H
12 matches
Mail list logo
