MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Layer and layer API members may be changed at runtime. Yes, the current
> structure
> members are all static, but they don't have to be.
Please note: only the layer API was changed.
> I would reverse this patch.
A xxx_layer_api seems rather const to me, co
Ron Blaschke writes:
Should I file bug reports for every different looking problem, and
start looking for what's going wrong?
Yes please. email to parrotbug at parrotcode.org for each new issue.
On a personal note, I (still) really like to help in win32, though
it's quite hard for me to get a gri
Closed, per Ron.
I guess this one can be closed.
t\library\streamsok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=20, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.00 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
Tested on win32-ms-cl_13.10.3077 (WinXP, VC.NET, ICU 3.0)
(PS: Sorry for the duplicate comments on this issue.)
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Sriram Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to build Parrot (from CVS) on Win XP Sp2 with VS.-NET 2003.
> Please folks with Windows installed: have a look at these issues.
I'm running Windows XP, VS.NET 2003 and (precompiled) ICU 3.0, and can
confirm the offe
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 01:18 am, Markus Laire wrote:
> Luke Palmer writes:
> > Yeah, the sigils do get in the way for small placeholder variables like
> > these:
> > Â @C[ $i; $j; $k; $l ] = @A[ $i; $j ] * @B[ $k; $l ] Â
>...
> Would placeholder variables be used often enough to varrant th
Layer and layer API members may be changed at runtime. Yes, the current
structure
members are all static, but they don't have to be.
I would reverse this patch.
-Melvin
At 06:26 AM 1/31/2005, via RT wrote:
# New Ticket Created by François PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #34002]
# in t
For your entertainment:
"Lua’s Story of O"
http://alt.textdrive.com/lua/19/lua-story-of-o
Cheers
--
PA, Onnay Equitursay
http://alt.textdrive.com/
I just skimmed the perl.com article about Phalanx,
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2005/01/13/phalanx.html
and this project looks to be right up my alley.
Anyhow, I've got a bit more reading to do on the
project before setting out to make a contribution,
but I figured I'd say a brief "hello" just for
sta
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But then you effectively morph the resulting bound method into a NCI
> instead of a PyNCI with the following line of code:
> bound_meth->vtable = Parrot_base_vtables[enum_class_Bound_NCI];
Yes. That's a general problem in all places, where the Parrot core
cr
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Why so? Python methods don't have a notion of an object - it's just the
>> first argument passed into a function. So I don't quite understand your
>> conclusion.
> In the case of
>x.y(z)
> The caller is passing one argument. T
Sriram Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to build Parrot (from CVS) on Win XP Sp2 with VS.-NET 2003.
Please folks with Windows installed: have a look at these issues.
leo
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The common cases I want to optimize for are common functions being
called as common functions. And common methods being called as methods.
Yep, that's very reasonable.
The easiest way to optimize for the common methods being called as
meth
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+else if (p->vtable->base_type == enum_class_NCI) {
It was requested[1] that I not add any Python specific methods to the
NCI method... accordingly, the majority of Python methods are morphed to
a PyNCI c
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The common cases I want to optimize for are common functions being
> called as common functions. And common methods being called as methods.
Yep, that's very reasonable.
> The easiest way to optimize for the common methods being called as
> methods is if th
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> +else if (p->vtable->base_type == enum_class_NCI) {
> It was requested[1] that I not add any Python specific methods to the
> NCI method... accordingly, the majority of Python methods are morphed to
> a PyNCI class which
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
... But that doesn't
work fur user methods, especially if there is no indication that a user
function is used as a method in the first place.
def find(s, sub):
...
In Python, this is statically determinable. If
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+else if (p->vtable->base_type == enum_class_NCI) {
It was requested[1] that I not add any Python specific methods to the
NCI method... accordingly, the majority of Python methods are morphed to
a PyNCI class which subclasses the base NCI class.
- Sam Ruby
[1]
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch changes the error to:
>Cannot read line from empty filehandle
Done.
> It also changes the function used to raise the exception from
> real_exception to internal_exception
We've to change a lot of internal_exceptions to real one
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have changed dynclasses.in to use the CONDITIONED_LINE hack. So there
> is no longer a need to access a potentially undefined config value.
Thanks, applied.
leo
François" PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All instances of ParrotIOLayerAPI could be declared as 'const' in the IO
> subsystem.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since no one has said anything to the contrary, would someone remove
> it?
Done.
leo
If you've already seen this through the Google Groups interface, sorry! I'm
kind of confused about the syncing between the Google interface and this
list - and it seems that my posts never made it here. The original is here
(http://groups-beta.google.com/group/perl.perl6.internals/browse_thread/
Comrade Burnout wrote:
I remember seeing that the list-joining thingie mentioned an
introduction once someone joined, so here it is:
I'm geektron on perlmonks, and Brian Clarkson IRL.
I've talked a bit to Mr. Lester and Mr. Kinyon about tests, and decided
that learning some good testing skills w
Luke Palmer writes:
Craig DeForest writes:
Yeah, the sigils do get in the way for small placeholder variables like
these.
 @C[ $i; $j; $k; $l ] = @A[ $i; $j ] * @B[ $k; $l ] Â
Losing the carets doesn't do much for us (and would force us to use the
explicit syntax, whatever that might be). Hmm
25 matches
Mail list logo
