Re: test_main.c oversight

2005-01-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't find define of "Parrot_setflag()" in test_main.c. src/test_main.c is unused. Why do you want to compile it? leo

test_main.c oversight

2005-01-20 Thread bloves
hi,all I don't find define of "Parrot_setflag()" in test_main.c. but, i finded it in embed.c,it already changeed.(Parrot_set_flag()); test_main.c 27 line #define setopt(flag) Parrot_setflag(interpreter, flag, (*argv)[0]+2); #define setopt(flag) Parrot_set_flag(interpreter, flag,

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-20 Thread leif . eriksen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leif Eriksen wrote: Hi, I am doing some testing under Devel::Cover, and get some weird results sometimes. What should I be looking at in my code or test cases that is provoking this discrepancy? Look for code that sneaks past perl under normal circumstances but not

Re: Name of parrot executable

2005-01-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 1:50 PM -0500 1/19/05, Matt Diephouse wrote: On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:09:19 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good point--we should. That'd mean we'd want to have three sets of data: the invoked full/base name, the 'program' full/base name, and the interpreter full/base name. Then

Re: Proposed vtable changes WRT method lookup

2005-01-20 Thread Matt Fowles
Leo~ On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:01:42 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Leo~ > > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:26:07 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> [ cc'ed p6l ] > >> > >> Matt Fowles wrote: > >> > Leo~ > >> > > >> >

Re: failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-20 Thread James E Keenan
Leif Eriksen wrote: Hi, I am doing some testing under Devel::Cover, and get some weird results sometimes. What should I be looking at in my code or test cases that is provoking this discrepancy? Without D::C ++ [snip] All tests successful. Files=13, Tes

Re: failures under Devel::Cover only

2005-01-20 Thread James E Keenan
Leif Eriksen wrote: Hi, I am doing some testing under Devel::Cover, and get some weird results sometimes. What should I be looking at in my code or test cases that is provoking this discrepancy? Here's a link to the posting I did on Devel::Cover several months back to which I referred a few

Re: RT Hall of Shame [perl #15308]

2005-01-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This week's Hall of Shame ticket is [perl #15308] It's outdated and obsolete. We have nested keys since quite a time. And vtables do inherit default methods. leo

Re: Roadmap, RT, TODO...

2005-01-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had great plans to flesh it out more than I have, but work has > intruded. I've checked in what I have so far in docs/ROADMAP. I really appreciate the effort putting all that together. But it's not that simple. E.g. the TODO WRT pdd05: this pdd is tot

Re: Proposed vtable changes WRT method lookup

2005-01-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leo~ > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:26:07 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [ cc'ed p6l ] >> >> Matt Fowles wrote: >> > Leo~ >> > >> > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:02:26 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >>But where doe