> [gmpassos - Sat Jul 12 02:23:08 2003]:
>
> Can't compile /languages with VC++ 6!
>
> Parrot compiles fine, but when I try to compile languages, specially
> /languages/imcc I can't!
languages/imcc is now long gone. Closing this ticket, please open a new
one if you're still having trouble.
Rega
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jun 30 07:15:44 2003]:
>
>
> A further data point: the tests pass if I use IMCC to assemble them,
> rather than assemble.pl
>
> Simon
>
Since assemble.pl is no more, closing this ticket.
> [brentdax - Sat Sep 28 04:08:17 2002]:
>
> This patch adds a very, very rudimentary form of C-level exception
> handling ...
I think it's safe to close out this ticket now. ^_^
> [brondsem - Tue Dec 14 09:26:42 2004]:
>
>
> PDDs 4-6 (maybe more) are not generated properly on parrotcode.org
>
>
>
Thank you for your report. I've forwarded a patch to the parrotcode
webmaster, this fix will probably be in place in a day or so
Joe Gottman writes:
>It would be nice if there were some easy way to mimic the Perl5 behavior
> in Perl6. In Perl6, the canonical way to make a variable local to a block
> is by making it a parameter. I therefore suggest allowing the following
> syntax:
>
> loop 0 -> $n; $n < 10; ++$n {..
Joe Gottman skribis 2005-01-13 19:35 (-0500):
>In Perl5, given code like
> for (my $n = 0; $n < 10; ++$n) {.}
> the control variable $n will be local to the for loop. In the equivalent
> Perl6 code
>loop my $n = 0; $n < 10; ++$n {.}
> $n will not be local to the loop but will instead
In Perl5, given code like
for (my $n = 0; $n < 10; ++$n) {.}
the control variable $n will be local to the for loop. In the equivalent
Perl6 code
loop my $n = 0; $n < 10; ++$n {.}
$n will not be local to the loop but will instead persist until the end of
enclosing block.
It woul
Hmmm... David, you seem to have covered all the issues with that rather
lucid screed [attached at bottom]. I have a couple of dragon-nits to pick,
one involving infrastructure and one involving syntax.
First: it seems strange to me to add yet another property ("but
used_to_be_scalar") to t
> > Parrot is now listed on CIA
> > (insert-at-point (spook))
>
> Ooo. spook's phrasebook is strictly US-ASCII. That's totally CIA-compatible,
> isn't it?
Probably. But they're still after those computer criminals. And
folks who use laser pointers.
-R
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:40:12PM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
>
> Parrot is now listed on CIA
> (insert-at-point (spook))
Ooo. spook's phrasebook is strictly US-ASCII. That's totally CIA-compatible,
isn't it?
It's also parrot compatible, as it's a subset of UTF-8, so it's fine for
commit messag
10 matches
Mail list logo
