On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > new P0, .ResizablePMCArray
> > set P0, 1
> > clone P1, P0
> > eq P0, P1, L1
> > print "not "
> > L1: print "ok"
> > print "\n"
> > end
>
> > prints "not ok".
>
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This code:
new P0, .Undef
new P1, .Undef
eq P0, P1, L1
print "not "
L1: print "ok\n"
end
prints "not ok". Should it?
That depends ;)
... If Parrot considers every Undef PMC to
be distinct, it's going to make
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This code:
> new P0, .Undef
> new P1, .Undef
> eq P0, P1, L1
> print "not "
> L1: print "ok\n"
> end
> prints "not ok". Should it?
That depends ;)
> ... If Parrot considers every Undef PMC to
> be distinct, it's goin
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I assume that the dynamic python lib has to export public symbols. You
>> could run one of the failing tests with a debugger and check the
>> Parrot_load_lib() steps.
>>
> OK, you were right. Once
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #33603]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33603 >
This code:
new P0, .Undef
new P1, .Undef
eq P0, P1, L1
pri
