Re: Parrot Forth 0.1

> Parrot Forth > > Released: 14 October 2004 > Version: 0.1 > Download: > http://matt.diephouse.com/software/parrot-forth-0.1.tar.gz > > This is the initial release of my > re-implementation of Parrot Forth in > PIR. Code reviews are both welcome and > appreciated (PIR is kind of > new

Re: Cross-compiling Parrot

At 9:49 AM -0400 10/17/04, Jacques Mony wrote: Hello, I'm trying to port parrot to the unununium operating system, which uses a modified version of 'diet lib c'. Can anyone tell me if this is actually possible to force the use of this library using the current Configure.pl script or if I will ne

NOTICE: New interpreter naming (people with pending patches, read this now)

The naming of the interpreter structure has changed. The struct is now called "parrot_interp_t"; use of the typedef "Interp" is now recommended in function declarations and definitions (e.g. C). This will affect many pending patches. If you're working on a patch, please check it to make sure it'

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #31978] [BUG] dynclasses broken

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:17:44 -0400, William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All tests successful, 4 tests and 52 subtests skipped. Committed, then. Thanks. -- Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perl and Parrot hacker There is no cabal. [I currently have a couple Gmail invites--co

Re: [Proposal] JIT, exec core, threads, and architectures

On Oct 17, 2004, at 3:18 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Jeff Clites wrote: On Oct 16, 2004, at 4:47 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Nethertheless we have to create managed objects (a Packfile PMC) so that we can recycle unused eval-segments. True, and some eval-segments are "done" as soon as they run (eval

Perl 6 Summary for 2004-10-01 through 2004-10-17

All~ Welcome to my first summary. Since I am relatively new at this game, I will just steal Piers's approach and start with Perl6 internals. But before that let me warn you that my ability to make strange characters with accents is not great, thus please do not be offended if I don't include the

Cross-compiling Parrot

Hello, I'm trying to port parrot to the unununium operating system, which uses a modified version of 'diet lib c'. Can anyone tell me if this is actually possible to force the use of this library using the current Configure.pl script or if I will need to change it a lot... or even replace it wit

[perl #32022] [PATCH] push_* for resizable PMCs

# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #32022] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32022 > Hi, this patch adds some relevant 'push' ops to the resizable PMCs, describe

[perl #32021] [PATCH] fix --tree option of pmc2c.pl

# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #32021] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32021 > Hi, this patch fixes the --tree option of classes/pmc2s.pl. The commands

Re: [Proposal] JIT, exec core, threads, and architectures

Jeff Clites wrote: On Oct 16, 2004, at 4:47 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote: String, number (and PMC) constants are all addressed in terms of the compiling interpreter. ... When we do an eval() e.g. in a loop, we have to create a new constant table (and recycle it later, which is a different problem).