On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:12:45 + (UTC), Mark Stosberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It also worked. Here's what I used:
>
> `echo 'y' | my_shell_cmd`
>
> I'm sure there's some other cooler way, but this works well enough for me.
Eventually you'll want something more flexible and portable. You
Mark Stosberg wrote:
`echo 'y' | my_shell_cmd`
I'm sure there's some other cooler way, but this works well enough for me.
If it needs something fancier, like a pseudoterminal, you can use the
Expect module (e.g., testing the Unix passwd program requires this).
But if the simple echo works, keep i
On 2004-10-17, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 16, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>
>> How can I write an automate test for a shell command that prompts for
>> output. I first tried just using backticks, but that hangs waiting for
>> input.
>
> Will it take its input from
On Oct 16, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
How can I write an automate test for a shell command that prompts for
output. I first tried just using backticks, but that hangs waiting for
input.
Will it take its input from STDIN? If so, pipe stdin to it.
xox,o
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROT
How can I write an automate test for a shell command that prompts for
output. I first tried just using backticks, but that hangs waiting for
input.
Thanks,
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
On Oct 16, 2004, at 12:26 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... But, we use this currently, because
there is one issue with threads: With a thread, you don't start from
the "beginning" of the JITted code segment,
This isn't a threading issue. We can always start exec
Good evening,
I am trying to use cpansmoke but I have a couple of issues
1) How can I say if I don't want to test a class of modules ?
e.g.
non of the Win32::* modules as I am on linux
no Oracle related modules as I have no Oracle
etc.
2) How can I run smoking on a machine th
oolong:~/research/parrot/include/parrot coke$ uname -a
Darwin oolong 7.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.5.0: Thu Aug 5 19:26:16 PDT 2004;
root:xnu/xnu-517.7.21.obj~3/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
perl is "v5.8.1-RC3"
All tests successful, 4 tests and 52 subtests skipped.
Files=122, Tests=1943,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:47:42 -0700 (PDT), Ovid
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Peter Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, what's the elegent way to ignore/dispose of the output the tested
> > module produces?
>
> What I do whenever this happens is to move the printing code to a subroutine
> or
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:04:50 -0400, Peter Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, what's the elegent way to ignore/dispose of the output the tested
> module produces?
Tie STDOUT. Look at Test::More's own test suite for examples.
http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/Test-Simple-0.49/t/lib/TieOut.pm
Sam Ruby wrote:
[ PMC method inheritance ]
Patch attached.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Christian Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> I'm using Linux/x86 with the Grsecurity.org patch applied, which is
> enforcing page execution permissions (PAX) unless you turn them off
> on a binary using the "chpax" userspace tool.
[ ... ]
> The correct solution would be to mark the resp
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It still doesn't make sense to me. Try adding the following line to
both fixedpmcarray.pmc and perlint.pmc:
METHOD INTVAL inheritme() { return 42; }
Ok, that's exactly that part, which currently *is* broken. If you have
some time please
Jeff Clites wrote:
We do still re-JIT for each thread on PPC, though we wouldn't have to
The real problem that all JIT architectures still have is a different
one: its called const_table and hidden either in the CONST macro or in
syntax like NUM_CONST, which is translated by the jit2h.pl utility
On Fri 15 Oct 2004 22:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PerlDiscuss - Perl Newsgroups and mailing
lists) wrote:
> I need to embed Perl function in C program running as a daemon on Linux
> and Solaris. What it needs is to do pattern matching in Perl while it is
If pattern matching is your only goal, why not
Hello
I'm using Linux/x86 with the Grsecurity.org patch applied, which is
enforcing page execution permissions (PAX) unless you turn them off
on a binary using the "chpax" userspace tool.
This means - unless you turn it off - an executable that is executing
code in a page which is not marked as
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Proposal:
>> * we mandate that JIT code uses interpreter-relative addressing
>> - because almost all platforms do it
>> - because some platforms just can't do anything else
>> - and of course to avoid
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It still doesn't make sense to me. Try adding the following line to
> both fixedpmcarray.pmc and perlint.pmc:
>METHOD INTVAL inheritme() { return 42; }
Ok, that's exactly that part, which currently *is* broken. If you have
some time please read src/obje
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At the same time, I'm not sure why we need this construct in a header:
>
> > struct Parrot_Interp;
>
> > typedef struct Parrot_Interp *Parrot_Interp;
>
> We don't need it. There was some discussio
19 matches
Mail list logo
