Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vaguely remember that perl6 was scheduled to be released in the
> fall... Can someone please remind me of which year?
Hi Stas - that's of course next year.
leo
David Storrs writes:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:02:34AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> > But indeed there are cases where it is a problem:
> >
> > my $x = 2;
> > sub mklist () {
> > return map { 2 * $_ } 0..10;
> > }
> >
> > my @list = mklist;
> > say @list[0..4];
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #30585]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30585 >
Since a couple of weeks, most Parrot m4 test are failing. The problem could
b
On Jul 4, Steve Fink said:
>Personally, I could see using it with the current prototype perl6
>compiler to take over the parsing whenever a regex is seen. The
>resulting tree structure would then be translated into a
>languages/regex-style tree, and from there converted into PIR
>instructions. The
Dennis Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> \devel\tinder\vc6\parrot\t\pmc\pmc_62.pasm")' failed with exit code 1
Thanks for reporting, fixed.
(This test is trying to instantiate each PMC type, which fails if
there is no BigInt implementation)
leo
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:02:34AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> But indeed there are cases where it is a problem:
>
> my $x = 2;
> sub mklist () {
> return map { 2 * $_ } 0..10;
> }
>
> my @list = mklist;
> say @list[0..4]; # 0 2 4 6 8
> $x = 1;
> say @list;
Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1. It would be very hard to create these options.
2. Any programmer that used an 'only these' option would almost
certainly create a program that at best would not work, and at worst would
coredump. Whats happens if the user forgot t
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #30576]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30576 >
This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the help of
On Jul-04, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
> I want to make sure I haven't misunderstood anything. *What* purpose will
> my module that will be able to parse Perl 6 regexes into a tree be? You
> must be aware that I have no power Damian does not possess, and I cannot
> translate *all* Perl 6 regexes t
I want to make sure I haven't misunderstood anything. *What* purpose will
my module that will be able to parse Perl 6 regexes into a tree be? You
must be aware that I have no power Damian does not possess, and I cannot
translate *all* Perl 6 regexes to Perl 5 regexes. All I can promise is a
tree
Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>1. It would be very hard to create these options.
>2. Any programmer that used an 'only these' option would almost
>certainly create a program that at best would not work, and at worst would
>coredump. Whats happens if the user forgot to copy $/ ? What d
# New Ticket Created by Dennis Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #30572]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30572 >
Hi,
there is one failing test on win32 (see starshadow tinderbox log):
http://tinder
12 matches
Mail list logo
