Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, time to think about this.
We need the ability to layer PMCs. Nothing new, we need something of the
sort for transparent read-only-ness and probably thread-safety (though
we don't have to do it that way) and folks are going to want to do
undoable custom vtable layering.
At 9:51 AM +0200 6/2/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
- don't load extensions at compile time, so that dynamic PMCs have to be
created with
$I0 = find_type "Foo"
$P0 = new $I0
Option two here would be the right one.
--
Dan
--
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> math library. The
>> library is e.g. F.
For example
> $ objdump -p parrot.exe
> DLL Name: cygwin1.dll
> vma: Hint/Ord Member-Name Bound-To
> 1b5588 14 __a
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... So the math library in
> > question is the /usr/include/math.h header?
>
> No. That's the header do declare functions in the
> math library. The
> library is e.g. F.
Well you see - that's what I thought but removing it
seemed to have absolute
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then, at runtime, 'fred' gets set up as the implemntation for an op.
> Which, given your implementation, means that each function call that
> fred makes should be protected with savetop/restoretop pairs. Oops.
The implementation checks register usage of
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % cat error.imc
> .sub _main @MAIN
> .local string na123me
> na123me = "/foo"
> loadlib $P0, na123me
> end
> .end
> % ./parrot -o error.pbc error.imc
> Couldn't load 'runtime/parrot/a123m':
The parser currently loads extensions at compile
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parrot doesn't use GMP right?
Right.
> ... So the math library in
> question is the /usr/include/math.h header?
No. That's the header do declare functions in the math library. The
library is e.g. F.
> WRT alignment there were some difference between
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, since I was asked, and I'm starting to hit a need for it in
> general, I want to address morph, and some of its ramifications. And
> limitations, as it seems like it's only a partial solution
The first question is: what are the supposed semantics of
