What, no one's awake? =-)
I've modified my local copy of tcl, and testall so that I can now do
any of the following, e.g. from the top level parrot directory.
cd languages && make test
cd languages/tcl && make test
cd languages && ./tcl/t/cmd_append.t
cd languages/tcl && ./t/cmd_append.t
cd lang
over in perl-qa, a similar topic just came up, where Schwern answered:
{
Test::Harness just runs the tests you give it. Simplest thing to do is
to just write a little script that has the necessary logic to determine
what
set of tests to run and feed that file list to runtests().
}
However, I no
Just committed some new docs for the Parrot::* modules.
make html-clean; make html
Mike
In PDD 15 it says
Creating a new class with attributes
Adding the attributes a and b to the new class Foo:
newclass $P0, "Foo"
addattribute $P0, "a", "Foo::a" # This is offset 0
addattribute $P0, "b", "Foo::b" # This is offset 1
maybe I'm just being a numpty but should this not be
Creatin
Ergh. Once agian, sorry if this shows up twice. If
someone can tell me a way to be subscribed to the list
without actually getting every message (I prefer to
read from the archive), that'd be great. Anyway...
> This has come up before and the discussion
> always semi-warnocks, but
Yeah...
> 1)
The second arg of GetExitCodeProcess should be a pointer to DWORD, not int,
this was causing a warning on mingw:
src/platform.c: In function `Parrot_Run_OS_Command':
src/platform.c:446: warning: passing arg 2 of `GetExitCodeProcess' from
incompatible pointer type
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:31:13AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
: At 6:59 AM + 3/27/04, Simon Cozens wrote:
: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Gottman) writes:
: >> This function would be very useful in inner loops, so if it is possible
: >> to
: >> implement it more efficiently in the core than as a sub
At 6:59 AM + 3/27/04, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Gottman) writes:
This function would be very useful in inner loops, so if it is possible to
implement it more efficiently in the core than as a sub in a module I think
we should do so.
And, if it's possible to implement it more
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I show my ignorance yet again. I really need to do some serious
> research into how things have changed...
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> It could work, if the sequence is:
>>
>>$P0 = $P1 + $P2
>>null $P3
>>$P3 = $P0 + $P4
>>
>> T
Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been all over the ops2c system recently filling in the
> documentation (it'll get committed this weekend sometime) so number 2
> is something I can certainly do.
Great, thanks
> BTW is there a reason for the colon at the start of the hints?
Hysteri
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ mmd functions ]
Another question:
,--[ pdd15 ]--
|While vtable methods may take a continuation, those
|continuations may not escape the vtable method's
|execution. This is due to
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The VS/.NET build works fine, though three of the tests fail for odd
> reasons.
t\op\string.t 1 256 1301 0.77% 123
Missing end
t\pmc\perlnum.t 1 256361 2.78% 36
The ugly +/- zero test. Needs further investigation.
I've been all over the ops2c system recently filling in the
documentation (it'll get committed this weekend sometime) so number 2
is something I can certainly do.
BTW is there a reason for the colon at the start of the hints?
Mike
On 27 Mar 2004, at 08:15, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Opcodes norma
And I show my ignorance yet again. I really need to do some serious
research into how things have changed...
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
It could work, if the sequence is:
$P0 = $P1 + $P2
null $P3
$P3 = $P0 + $P4
The C opcode cuts the life range of C<$P3> because of
its C specifier.
Hmmm...
14 matches
Mail list logo
