On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, at 06:03 PM, Robert Spier wrote:
If you respond to this message, with the ticket id and brief reason
why it can be closed, i.e. "patch applied", "patch rejected", "bad
idea".. I'll do the labor of updating the ticketing system.
-R
18044: Assembler doesn't return a u
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 21:54, Will Coleda wrote:
> Minor typo in library/dumper.imc for unknown pmcs
Thanks, applied.
-- c
As promised.
The "new" site is now live.
-R
>
> This is on my list for tonight. I've got something all ready to go
> but have been busy with a $NEW_JOB.
>
> -R
>
> At Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:44:02 -0500,
> Mitchell N Charity wrote:
> >
> > The parrot homepage
> > http://www.parrotcode.org/
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #27336]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27336 >
Minor typo in library/dumper.imc for unknown pmcs
dumper.diff
Description: Binary d
Nigel Sandever wrote:
> If my lack of experience with OSS/unix makes my willingness to
> contribute to the project unviable, then a simple statement; "stop
> bothering us" will stop me wasting your time and mine.
If I may, most of the US East Coast is settling down for bed right now,
and most of t
Tj Anthony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [silent lurker alert]
Not more ;)
> Parrot will build on Cygwin, as long as you configure with:
> perl Configure.pl --define-inet_aton
Good.
> The tests, however, are a different story. Notably, extend_12 runs away
> and starts hopelessly consuming memo
The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20040229
> Native PBC issues
> It turns out that, just at the moment, Parrot bytecode isn't actually
> platform independent. This will, of course, get fixed, but it's not
> Leo's top priority at
Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parrot 0.1.0 builds on Linux/x86_64 w/gcc 3.3.3 (20040217) and
> glibc-2.3.3 (pre20040207) but a number of tests fail.
x86_64 is nowadays amd64 I presume. Can you please provide the output of
$ cat myconfig
> ... I can provide
> the complete test run i
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi leo,
> Here is the tetris example, include it if you want...
I've now tested it a bit. Looks really good and works - mostly :)
- it tries to load SDL_Image, albeit this seems to be unused
- some blocks are dropping down invisibly
- it doesn't recognize a
Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 10:08, Stefano Rodighiero ha scritto:
[...]
Someone thinks Leonardo Serni is like Nicolad Bourbaki.
^^^
Oops. That was 'Nicolas'. Sorry.
Stefano
Attached patch adds native exec support for win32's COFF format .o files. I
had to change some code that assumed the bytecode being used was from the
interpreter->code->src block, which wasn't the case when it's not being mmaped.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Fi
Tom Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:01:11AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
>>: That's a *very* interesting idea. What do people think?
>
>>I think anyone who does full justification without proportional
>>spacing and hyphenation is severely lacking in empathy for
Il giorno 02/mar/04, alle 04:12, Larry Wall ha scritto:
[...]
: Problem solved!!! ;-)
I think you prove my point. :-)
Very nice "certamen".
You would be probably thrilled by an italian Usenet poster I'm honoured
to know, who manually justifies every single post he writes. No extr
At 5:13 PM +0100 3/2/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Parrot's object support is not yet good enough to be able to
convert the game to use ParrotObjects.
What is missing?
Constructors and destructors are my two big guesses here. :-P
--
Dan
Parrot 0.1.0 builds on Linux/x86_64 w/gcc 3.3.3 (20040217) and glibc-2.3.3
(pre20040207) but a number of tests fail. I can provide the complete test run if
anyone thinks it will be helpful.
-J
--
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This trivial patch fixes a few typos I noticed while reading through
> docs/intro.pod
Thanks, applied.
leo
When writing PASM/PIR or digging in the Parrot source, you (as a vim
user) might find it helpful to run:
1) make -C editors
This installs a vim syntax file in ~/.vim/syntax/imc.vim
(I have it sym-linked as pasm.vim too).
And:
$cat ~/.vim/ftplugin/imc.vim
augroup filetypedetect
au Bu
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 02:31:47 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Nigelsandever @ Btconnect . Com) wrote:
> =_1078223508-4945-0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> # New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # Please include the string: [perl #27301]
> # in the subject line of all
Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 10:48 schrieb Leopold Toetsch:
- some blocks are dropping down invisibly
Which blocks?
It was the red (color=4) one, which vanished on my notebook, especially
when it got darkened after dropping down.
Parrot's object support is not yet good enou
At 9:24 PM -0800 3/1/04, Robert Spier wrote:
- I'm not sure about the reporting address (Robert, I need your advice
on this one)
I suppose, it should be something like parrotbugparrotcode.org
Anyone else want to brainstorm bug addresses for parrot?
Since we need a new system to handle ok/nok/f
At 8:57 AM +0100 3/2/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- the copyright is missing (Dan, please insert correct copyright)
All in parrot root is subject to terms in LICENSES.
Copyright notices still should be in the individual files.
--
Index: PLATFORMS
===
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/PLATFORMS,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -t -u -r1.15 PLATFORMS
--- PLATFORMS 1 Mar 2004 08:48:13 - 1.15
+++ PLATFORMS 2 Mar 2004 01:08:49 -
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
linux-sparc-g
If to define _STRUCT_TIMESPEC, then compilation is successfully.
% make test
perl t/harness --gc-debug --running-make-test -b t/op/*.t t/pmc/*.t
t/native_pbc/*.t imcc/t/*/*.t t/src/*.t
t/op/00ff-dos...ok
t/op/00ff-unix..ok
t/op/arithmeticsok
t/op/basic..ok
t/
This is on my list for tonight. I've got something all ready to go
but have been busy with a $NEW_JOB.
-R
At Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:44:02 -0500,
Mitchell N Charity wrote:
>
> The parrot homepage
> http://www.parrotcode.org/
> currently says
> Periodic releases will appear on CPAN; the current
The good news is that the infrastructure's in place to do delegated
method calls for vtable functions with objects. So you can actually
do something like:
.sub __MAIN prototyped
.param pmc argv
.local pmc foo
.local pmc bar
.local pmc asub
newclass P1, "Foo"
find_type I0, "Foo"
ne
Hi,
So I am currently trying to find another segfault, valgrind is helping
me but the only thing it really says is
==24093== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==24093==at 0x8273227: compact_pool (src/resources.c:301)
==24093==by 0x827300C: mem_allocate (src/resou
Larry wrote:
: Indeed, if Larry were to give the word, I'd be delighted to add support for
: it to the Perl6::Rules module.
Execute! (I hope that's the right word...)
I believe, Captain, the correct word would be: "Engage!"
Data^H^Hmian
A PASM version of the test case is:
newclass P16, "A"
subclass P16, P16, "B"
subclass P16, P16, "C"
end
I think I've figured out what's happening here. Stepping through the
code with gdb shows that the first subclassing works fine, but the second
blows up in Parrot_single_subcla
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #27287]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27287 >
This patch creates a couple of new small README's, for several
languages/ direct
At 5:58 PM +0100 3/2/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 17:19 schrieb Dan Sugalski:
At 5:13 PM +0100 3/2/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>Parrot's object support is not yet good enough to be able to
>>convert the game to use ParrotObjects.
>
>What is missing?
Constructors and de
Hi,
Just a quick check, why is Parrot_register_pmc not named as the other
Parrot_PMC_* functions in the external interface?
Cheers
Arthur
Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did not checked it in parrot's repository because:
> - I don't know where it should go in parrot tree
tools/dev invoked per "make bugreport"?
> - the copyright is missing (Dan, please insert correct copyright)
All in parrot root is subject to terms
# New Ticket Created by Dan Sugalski
# Please include the string: [perl #27314]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27314 >
If you have a pmc class that inherits from delegate you're out of
luck. All of deleg
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #27301]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27301 >
Does the naming and placement of this test fit convention?
The opcode is called
I've added two targets to the Makefile.
html: Generate HTML documentation from POD in the sources.
html-clean: Remove the HTML documentation.
Mike
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Jens Rieks wrote:
> from pdd 15:
> : instantiate Px, Py, Sz (Unimplemented)
> : Instantiate a brand new class, based on the metadata
> : in Py, named Sz.
> I think I have missread this last time. What it is op supposed to do?
>
> How can I create an object of class
Pmc class headers providing parts of parrot's C extension api are not
being included in extend.h. Such as the generated file
./classes/pmc_array.h, with its Parrot_Array_push_integer. Such files
are not being included anywhere in include/parrot/ at all.
So it looks like a ./config/gen/ generator
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> x86_64 is nowadays amd64 I presume. Can you please provide the output of
> $ cat myconfig
Summary of my parrot 0.1.0 configuration:
configdate='Tue Mar 2 11:51:06 2004'
Platform:
osname=linux, archname=x86_64-linux
jitcapable=0, jitarchnam
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> x86_64 is nowadays amd64 I presume. Can you please provide the output of
> $ cat myconfig
AMD originally was calling it x86-64. So it went into the Linux kernel as
./arch/x86_64. Then AMD renamed the instruction set to AMD64. Just to keep it
confu
The following code results in a
clone() not implemented in class 'ParrotClass'
error:
.sub _main
.local pmc a
.local pmc b
.local pmc c
newclass a, "A"
subclass b, a, "B"
subclass c, b, "C"
end
.end
jens
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 17:19 schrieb Dan Sugalski:
> At 5:13 PM +0100 3/2/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >>Parrot's object support is not yet good enough to be able to
> >>convert the game to use ParrotObjects.
> >
> >What is missing?
>
> Constructors and destructors are my two big guesses he
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 2. März 2004 10:48 schrieb Leopold Toetsch:
> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi leo,
> >
> > Here is the tetris example, include it if you want...
>
> I've now tested it a bit. Looks really good and works - mostly :)
> - it tries to load SDL_Image, albeit this seems to
42 matches
Mail list logo
