Michal Wallace writes:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > We also have to have a way to fetch the method PMC for a named method
> > for later use, which is where the interesting bits come in.
> >
> > This is required for a number of reasons, including Python, so we
> > have to have i
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Michal Wallace wrote:
> class Alice:
> def whoami(self):
> return "Alice"
> class Bruce:
> def whoami(self):
> return "Bruce"
>
> a = Alice()
> b = Bruce()
>
> a.whoami, b.whoami = b.whoami, a.whoami
> assert a.wh
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> We also have to have a way to fetch the method PMC for a named method
> for later use, which is where the interesting bits come in.
>
> This is required for a number of reasons, including Python, so we
> have to have it. The question is... *When* is the n
While I'm still working on the vtable and supporting code section,
most of the revamp of PDD15 (objects!) is checked into the repository.
It'd be worth checking it out and checking it out, as this would be
the time to get comments in.
great to see this, i guess everyone will agree. well, i have
Austin Hastings wrote:
Off the top of my head, I can't think of a case where the compare sub
would be needed unless the key was not well-ordered. Does anyone have
an example of a case where the key-extraction sub approach doesn't
reduce the problem to a Scalar comparison?
I can't find the P5 c
> "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AH> --- Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> there are rare times when you need a computed comparison, say with
>> a specialized collation sequence. if this sequence isn't supported
>> by locale or whatever, you need to do a c
--- Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AH> --- Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> @out = sort
> >> key:compare( \&my_compare_sub ) ( /(\d+)$/ ),
> >> @in ;
>
> >> note that the custome compare callbacks can be
> "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AH> --- Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> @out = sort
>> key:compare( \&my_compare_sub ) ( /(\d+)$/ ),
>> @in ;
>> note that the custome compare callbacks can be a block or a sub
>> name/ref. the callback sub would be p
--- Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @out = sort
> key( %lookup{ .{remotekey} } ),
> key:insensitive:descending:locale( 'somewhere' )( .{priority} ),
> key:float ( substr( 0, 10 ) ),
> key:integer ( /foo(\d+)bar/ ),
>
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:35:02PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>docs/debug.pod /jit
> saw that one, but jit doesn't generate a .o file under sparc?
Calling Parrot_jit_debug() is enabled for __GNUC__ and __IBMC__. If your
system doesn't define one
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:35:02PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>docs/debug.pod /jit
saw that one, but jit doesn't generate a .o file under sparc?
Stéphane
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whats a good way to debug jit?
s. docs/jit.pod /Debugging
docs/debug.pod /jit
> Thanks,
> Stephane
leo
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:48:09AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I don't know suns JIT code nor the assembler syntax, but it seems that
> the two subcc lines are broken:
>
> emitm_subcc_r(NATIVECODE, MAP[1], emitm_g(0), emitm_g(0));
>
> If I understand that correctly it should read:
>
>
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I'm still working on the vtable and supporting code section,
> most of the revamp of PDD15 (objects!) is checked into the
> repository. It'd be worth checking it out and checking it out, as
> this would be the time to get comments in.
1) Why is the e
Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know head can not compile at all, but maybe this can help to know that
> the following tests fail on my Slackware Linux:
> t/pmc/signalNOK 2# Failed test (t/pmc/signal.t at line 44)
These signal tests are a big hack. Par
15 matches
Mail list logo
