> Please let me know when you do document the format and make
> sure to allow for extensions. I urge you do to so before
> the sample size, and divergent extensions, gets too large.
Patches are always welcome. Also, I don't see any sample size greater
than one on this, unless I'
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:27:02 -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:41:59AM -0600, Scott Bolte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ) wrote:
> > I agree, but I still believe it would be good if Test::Harness
> > laid out syntax rules for extensions.
>
> There are no extensions. They're up
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 05:27:02PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:41:59AM -0600, Scott Bolte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I agree, but I still believe it would be good if Test::Harness
> > laid out syntax rules for extensions.
>
> There are no extensions. They're
On 9 Feb 2004, at 01:49, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Have the LZW patents(*) expired everywhere yet
google tells me there's one down and seven to go
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/6/19/35919/4079
I just pinched it from parrotcode.org. Does that make me a felon?
Mike
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:08:25AM -, Mike Scott wrote:
> cvsuser 04/02/08 16:08:25
>
> Added: docs/resources up.gif
> Log:
> another image for the docs
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.1 parrot/docs/resources/up.gif
>
> <>
Have the LZW patent
On Jan 26, 2004, at 2:00 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that t/src/io is now failing on OS X 10.3.2. Is anyone else
seeing this on another system?
t/src/iook 12/19# Failed test (t/src/io.t at line
395)
# got: '0
# 0
# 0
# '
#
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:41:59AM -0600, Scott Bolte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I agree, but I still believe it would be good if Test::Harness
> laid out syntax rules for extensions.
There are no extensions. They're up to whoever wants to. I'm certainly
not going to define arbitra
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
> What's the best way to access fields within an UnManagedStruct, one
> returned from an NCI call? For example, if I call _new_SDL_Screen, how
> can I access the w and h fields of the SDL_Surface it returns?
> I've tried creating an OrderedHash ca
Hi there,
What's the best way to access fields within an UnManagedStruct, one
returned from an NCI call? For example, if I call _new_SDL_Screen, how
can I access the w and h fields of the SDL_Surface it returns?
I've tried creating an OrderedHash called layout and then doing:
set screen
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 11:03:42AM -0600, Scott Bolte wrote:
> I'd like to propose an addition to the Test::Harness parsing
> rules to support dependency analysis. That, in turn, allows
> monitoring for file changes and selective, immediate
> re-execution of test files. Is
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:34:01 -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> Test::Harness parses 'ok' and 'not ok' and 'Bail out'... Test::*
> modules produce the output Test::Harness parses. So your extra logic
> to parse "depends on" would go into your Test::Harness extension, but
> the depends_on() funct
11 matches
Mail list logo