Luke Palmer wrote:
Joe Gottman writes:
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: [perl] Re: Object Order of Precedence (Was: Vocabulary)
Larry Wall wrote:
If DangerousPet doesn't define a
Joe Gottman writes:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jonathan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:41 PM
> Subject: [perl] Re: Object Order of Precedence (Was: Vocabulary)
>
>
> > Larry Wall wrote:
> > > If DangerousPet doesn't defin
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: [perl] Re: Object Order of Precedence (Was: Vocabulary)
> Larry Wall wrote:
> > If DangerousPet doesn't define a feed method at all, then we might
>
I've trained the filter with all of Novembers spam, and done a few
tweaks, and removed the recent offending messages from the parrot
queue.
Sorry for the annoyance.
-R
# Ticket 24616 updated.
# Ticket 24655 updated.
# Ticket 24677 updated.
# Ticket 24692 updated.
# Ticket 24696 updated.
# Ticke
# New Ticket Created by "Madge Anaya"
# Please include the string: [perl #24722]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24722 >
shingle craftsmen actual see cutworm pavanne bernhard rumble mottle ambitious
yolk eur
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:21:10PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:12:53PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: : Why not do it the same way that namespace scoping collisions are resolved:
: : the local scope trumps the caller's scope. Rinse, lather, repeat.
Actually, I didn't se
Larry Wall wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : In a similar vein, what about making a disjunction of classes in an
> : C or C clause synonymous with a sequence of appropriate
> : clauses? Ditto with traits and C, roles and C, attributes
> : and C, etc.; thus:
> :
> : class DangerousPet does Pe
Larry Wall wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : It also occurs to me that traits can be thought of
> : as adjectives (thus the "is " vs. "is a " distinction) -
> : another way to attach an adjective to a noun in English is to prepend
> : it to the noun:
> :
> : my Dog $Spot is red;
> : my black
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:12:53PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Naming in what way? As a descriptive term for discussing them in general,
: or naming individual collections for reference purposes in the code?
I meant naming primarily as in how you select a particular group of them.
They don't
Larry Wall wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : > Arguably, the role's might be required to declare their methods
> : > "multi" if they want to participate in this, but that's one of those
> : > things that feel like they ought to be declared by the user rather
> : > than the definer. On the other h
Is it possible to unread characters from an input stream in Parrot? (ie.
if I do a "read char, 1", decide later than I don't want the character so
I push it back on the stream)
Failing that, is it possible to peek ahead at a character without
necessarily taking it off the stream?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
> is classof($x)
Ouch. $x's class isn't a property or trait of it?
> class AnonClass is classof($x) does FooBar { }.bless($x, foobar => bar)
I don't understand what the bit at the end is doing. This is calling .bless
on the overriden method? And I'm not
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 12:41:10PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: So what happens if more than one of the candidates is tagged as the
: default? The same thing as if none of them was? This could happen if
: both Predator and Pet have declared their 'feed' methods as the default.
Could blow up,
Main changes
added is_fastest()
comparison was broken (but not completely broken so it still passed the tests)
available soon on CPAN and now on
http://www.fergaldaly.com/computer/Test-Benchmark/
F
Larry Wall wrote:
> Maybe there's an intermediate syntactic form like:
>
> $x but subclass MyClass does FooBar[bar] { }
IMHO, C should be defined as generating a singleton class that
derives from the variable's class and composes a specified role - but not
neccessarily a I role. How about de
* The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-16 11:57]:
> bear in mind that the authors of the paper use the term
> 'trait' for what we're calling a 'role' (We already have
> traits you see).
>
> http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~black/publications/TR_CSE_02-012.pdf
> -- Traits p
Beware :) This patch changes Parrot_loadbc to Parrot_set_packfile.
0x4C56
diff
Description: Binary data
Larry Wall wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : Larry Wall wrote:
> : > Jonathan Lang wrote:
> Also, there will be access to the list of call candidates for SUPER::
> (and presumably ROLE::) such that the class's method can get explicit
> control of which super/role method or methods get called. So
Leo wrote:
>
> I had a short look at the subdir hierarchy, looks good.
Excellent.
> (perl6:run_tests, Makefile, and t/harness have to learn how to deal with
> differently deep nested test files though).
Yeah, that's on my Todo list. Hmmm... I should probably add the list to
the repository.
> I
Piers wrote:
>
> p6d?
The perl6-documentation list. Started around Nov. 2002, it had about 3
months of heavy traffic and not much since. But, we did get a good plan
for the direction of p6 testing out of it.
Allison
On Dec 20, 2003, at 1:54 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The issue turns out to be that SIGFPE isn't raised on Mac OS X on
divide by zero. If I hack src/core_ops.c to explicitly raise(SIGFPE)
in
the case of zero divisor then the tests pass, so the exception
han
# New Ticket Created by "Seymour Medeiros"
# Please include the string: [perl #24715]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24715 >
Refinance today to as low as 1.5%! or buy
the home of your dreams!
It's not too l
JüRgen" "BöMmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the *.ops files are lying in the ops/ directory, but the generated
> c-files go to the src/ directory. This is completly different from
> classes/, imcc/ etc. where the generated c-files go to the same
> directory. Is this difference intentional?
Soun
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue turns out to be that SIGFPE isn't raised on Mac OS X on
> divide by zero. If I hack src/core_ops.c to explicitly raise(SIGFPE) in
> the case of zero divisor then the tests pass, so the exception handling
> code seems to be working correctly.
Ah,
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leo wrote:
>>
>> > I've added two test files, bitwise.t and concat.t, which go in t/op/
>> > (the op/ directory doesn't exist yet)
>>
>> Missing?
> The directory needs to be added. We're gradually moving our way toward
> the test hierarchy planned on p6d
apologies for the recent spam leakage.. it looks like I need to do my
bi-monthly tuning.
I'll try and get to it as soon as I can.
-R
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Leo wrote:
>>
>> > I've added two test files, bitwise.t and concat.t, which go in t/op/
>> > (the op/ directory doesn't exist yet)
>>
>> Missing?
>
> The directory needs to be added. We're gradually moving our way toward
> the test hierarchy planned o
27 matches
Mail list logo
