Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I've been following this list
> with one eye tied behind my back...
> What happened to setline? Should I
> emit something else instead?
Both C and C are parsed and swallowed in the lexer.
The data will finally end in an HLL debug PBC segment.
>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:18:12AM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
: By the way, I trust this will be addressed (if it hasn't been already):
:
: perl5 -le 'print "gah!" if exists $a{b}{c}; print "phooey!" if exists $a{b}'
:
: perlfunc says:
:
: This surprising autovivification in what does not at f
: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
: >
: >
: >>I would hope the former. However, what about this compile-time
: >>integral power macro[1]?
: >>
: >> macro power ($x, $p) {
: >> if $p > 0 {
: >> { $x * power($x, $p-1) }
: >> }
: >> else {
: >> { 1 }
:
At 7:48 PM -0400 9/25/03, Michal Wallace wrote:
Sorry, I've been following this list
with one eye tied behind my back...
What happened to setline? Should I
emit something else instead?
It's never really been the right thing to do, but we've not got the
alternative, line metadata in the bytecode fi
Sorry, I've been following this list
with one eye tied behind my back...
What happened to setline? Should I
emit something else instead?
Sincerely,
Michal J Wallace
Sabren Enterprises, Inc.
-
contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hosting: http://www.cornerhost.com/
m
> Anyone care to take a shot at getting it building? (Might well be
> dead-trivial, I don't know)
Dead trivial.
./configure --disable-layout --disable-tests --disable-samples
-R
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Robert Spier wrote:
>
> Ok. New ICU (2.6.1) has been committed.
Cool, thanks much.
Anyone care to take a shot at getting it building? (Might well be
dead-trivial, I don't know)
Dan
Ok. New ICU (2.6.1) has been committed.
-R
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Robert Spier wrote:
> > Say we apply 2.6 over what is there and it doesn't build, we then have
> > to ask ourselves if the applying-over's to blame. Just seemed like one
> > uncertainty that could be avoided.
>
> Point.. although this can generally be done properly with a
> > Unless you meant "remove from the repository, such that it never
> > existed in the first place" when you said "delete".
>
> Yes, I meant that.
That's quite doable, if people understand the repercussion. (rm -r
is easy!)
> Say we apply 2.6 over what is there and it doesn't build, we then h
i tried to build a program and have only one error but seem not to be able to fix it.
i think it is a rather small one. i would really appreciate it if you help me with
this situation:
if (num1 %2 =0)
the error is: error C2106: '=' : left operand must be l-value.
thank you very much. i await
Hi:
In case it helps, it looks like it's crashing at string.c:552, because
it's trying to call src->encoding->decode() but src->encoding is NULL.
(gdb) f 0
#0 0x6104 in string_transcode (interpreter=0x616400, src=0x623440,
encoding=0x19e43c, type=0x19a6fc, dest_ptr=0x0) at string.c:552
552
Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
> 0x5f30 in string_transcode ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x5f30 in string_transcode ()
Thanks for the backtrace - doesn't help much though.
Anyway I've commited a patch to reenable 'debuggi
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fair enough. I'd not realized we had a runtime directory.
BTW some warnocked stuff:
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 17:01:36 +0200
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: some fun SubProxy
,--[ orig text ]
On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 16:06 Europe/Berlin, Michael Scott wrote:
On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Leopold Toetsch
wrote:
Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
t/src/hash.t
test 7 fails on Mac OS X 10.2.6 (gcc 3.3) because BIGLEN is too big:
9.
100_000 chars for
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Todd W. writes:
> > I have a question/request concerning perl6 object properties.
>
> Rather, attributes. Properties are out-of-band data attached to a
> particular object.
FWIW, "attribute" and "property" are two words that have a meaning that
shifts
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Todd W. wrote:
> I have a question/request concerning perl6 object properties.
>
> I've done some work with .NET and They have come up with a really slick way
> to handle object properties.
>
> A typical property definition in VB.NET looks like:
>
> Public Property descript
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > Okay, we're starting to get some library code. I've a full (hopefully)
> > ncurses interface .pasm file
>
> The ncurses lib is reall great.
:) Now we can have multicolored life! Woohoo!
> > lib/ subdirectory for assembly
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > ...I can, and have, written the C code to make this happen
> > in build_nativecall.pl, but that doesn't help on the x86 platforms which
> > build this stuff up dynamically.
>
> You allways can edit nci.c (or build_nativec
On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Leopold Toetsch
wrote:
Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
t/src/hash.t
test 7 fails on Mac OS X 10.2.6 (gcc 3.3) because BIGLEN is too big:
9.
100_000 chars for the key doesn't seem to be very big.
Wher does it fail?
Can you debug/bac
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, we're starting to get some library code. I've a full (hopefully)
ncurses interface .pasm file
The ncurses lib is reall great.
lib/ subdirectory for assembly and/or imcc library code?
I'd rather kept all that stuff in runtime/parrot/* where there are
already things to
Dan Sugalski wrote:
...I can, and have, written the C code to make this happen
in build_nativecall.pl, but that doesn't help on the x86 platforms which
build this stuff up dynamically.
You allways can edit nci.c (or build_nativecall.pl) and undef (or mangle
the define of) CAN_BUILD_CALL_FRAMES
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 15:10, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > Ok, fixed that and some other issues Leo addressed. Now I have my own
> > register management and put all the not needed registers on the user
> > stack.
>
> Why? Parrot with the PIR assembler can handle an arbitrary register
> count. I'm su
# New Ticket Created by Michael Scott
# Please include the string: [perl #24038]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24038 >
PIO_parse_open_flags thinks that "<" is the same as "<". This
could lead to er
Marcus Thiesen wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 11:08, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
$I46 = $I100 + $I200
Ok, fixed that and some other issues Leo addressed. Now I have my own
register management and put all the not needed registers on the user
stack.
Why? Parrot with the PIR assembler can handle an arbitra
Here are some tests for the io.h API that should go in t/src/io.t.
Maybe some of the expected results are debatable.
Should PIO_parse_open_flags think that "<" is the same as "<"?
Should PIO_fdopen open ok on stdout with invalid flags like ";-)" or ""?
Also, successive calls to PIO_seek
Michael Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> t/src/hash.t
> test 7 fails on Mac OS X 10.2.6 (gcc 3.3) because BIGLEN is too big:
> 9.
100_000 chars for the key doesn't seem to be very big.
Wher does it fail?
Can you debug/back-trace it?
> I've made it a bit smaller: 65536.
> This begs the qu
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 11:08, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Further: as URM has an arbitrary amount of registers, it would be much
> simpler to target PIR code.
>
> r46 <- r100 + r200
>
> is currently for sure an error. OTOH translating this to
>
>
> $I46 = $I100 + $I200
>
Ok, fixed that and so
Luke Palmer wrote:
Dan Sugalski writes:
... For this, I think we're
going to need a "setp Ix, Py" op which does indirect register addressing.
Fair enough. I do suppose there will be a way to keep the register
allocation intact while doing this. Or maybe these ops are for IMCC's
personal use,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:53:39PM -0400, Todd W. wrote:
I posted a question to CLPM on how to do this with perl5 and we decided to
use an 'lvalue' attribute on the subroutine and then make the returned
lvalue in the sub a tied variable to intercept read/writes:
http://groups.google.com/groups?t
On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 00:41 Europe/Berlin, Robert Spier wrote:
Which version of ICU is in parrot/icu. Maybe 2.6 would be the most
likely to build.
As an update would probably best be done by delete and replace,
perhaps
it could coincide with the great renaming?
Actually, it would be best
Todd W. writes:
> I have a question/request concerning perl6 object properties.
Rather, attributes. Properties are out-of-band data attached to a
particular object.
> I've done some work with .NET and They have come up with a really slick way
> to handle object properties.
>
> A typical propert
I have a question/request concerning perl6 object properties.
I've done some work with .NET and They have come up with a really slick
way to handle object properties.
A typical property definition in VB.NET looks like:
Public Property propertyName() As String
Get
return aString
End Get
I have a question/request concerning perl6 object properties.
I've done some work with .NET and They have come up with a really slick way
to handle object properties.
A typical property definition in VB.NET looks like:
Public Property description() As String
Get
return aString
End Get
34 matches
Mail list logo
