Re: Perldoc Project

2003-07-26 Thread Piers Cawley
Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:55:42AM -0600, Nick Pinckernell wrote: >> I agree with the first three items right out of >> http://dev.perl.org/rfc/5.pod >> 1. IT'S NOT INTUITIVE > > "Intuitive" is one of those meaningless buzzwords like "maintainable". >

PIO types

2003-07-26 Thread Vladimir Lipskiy
As far as I can get, Parrot_WIN32_HANDLE, Parrot_OFF_T haven't been implemented yet, because the better I got on Win32 is: cl -nologo -Od -MD -Zi -DDEBUGGING -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT -I./includ e -DHAS_JIT -DI386 -Foexceptions.obj -c exceptions.c exceptions.c ./include\parrot/io.h(123) :

Re: Protocols

2003-07-26 Thread Richard J Cox
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, 5:45:33 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 08:49 AM, David Wheeler wrote: > No, I think Java interfaces are a kluge to get around copying a broken > type system and the lack of multiple inheritance. There are other alternatives..