Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:55:42AM -0600, Nick Pinckernell wrote:
>> I agree with the first three items right out of
>> http://dev.perl.org/rfc/5.pod
>> 1. IT'S NOT INTUITIVE
>
> "Intuitive" is one of those meaningless buzzwords like "maintainable".
>
As far as I can get, Parrot_WIN32_HANDLE, Parrot_OFF_T
haven't been implemented yet, because the better I got on Win32 is:
cl -nologo -Od -MD -Zi -DDEBUGGING -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT -I./includ
e -DHAS_JIT -DI386 -Foexceptions.obj -c exceptions.c
exceptions.c
./include\parrot/io.h(123) :
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, 5:45:33 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 08:49 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
> No, I think Java interfaces are a kluge to get around copying a broken
> type system and the lack of multiple inheritance.
There are other alternatives..
