Piers Cawley wrote:
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... I didn't follow about how that interferes with tail-call
optimization. (To me, "tail call optimization" == "replace recursive
call with a goto to the end of the function preamble")
Um... no. tail call optimization implies being able t
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this has been discussd before, but are we all okay with this
> callee-save-everything policy? At the very least, I'd be tempted to
> add a bitmasked saveall/restoreall pair to reduce the amount of cache
> thrashing. ("saveall 0b0010011000
Hello,
Some time ago I posted something about a Lua->Parrot compiler I was planning to write
as a project for my bachelor's in computer science. (about 4/5 weeks ago I think)
Just to let you know where the project stands (in case you're interested), here's a
short overview:
The lexer (made with
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 11:13:30AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Cool. When we do that I'd like to look at revamping the tinderbox
> > system to run tests on all the core types.
>
> I know I'm asking a needless question (because I should be able to w
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) sync with CVS
> Currently tinderboxen seem to delete the whole tree and start from
> scratch. This generates a lot of traffic (albeit - thanks - not mine),
> but this is IMHO not necessary:
>
>
> $ cvs -z3 update [-d...] -dP parrot >$FULL_LOG 2>&1
