Re: [RfD] parrot run loops

2003-02-01 Thread Jason Gloudon
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:46:50AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > #define IREG(i) interpreter->ctx.int_reg.registers[code_start[offs+i]] Where does the value of code_start coming from ? code_start in an opcode function is not a constant, so the above is really: interpreter->ctx.int_reg.register

Re: [RfD] parrot run loops

2003-02-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jason Gloudon wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:07:26AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: code_start = interpreter->code->base.data; // new syntax while (offs) offs = interp->func_table[*(code_start+offs)](offs, ..) It's unclear to me whether you are saying the opcode functions would sti

Re: [RfD] parrot run loops

2003-02-01 Thread Jason Gloudon
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:07:26AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > code_start = interpreter->code->base.data; // new syntax > while (offs) > offs = interp->func_table[*(code_start+offs)](offs, ..) It's unclear to me whether you are saying the opcode functions would still be passed the PC

Re: [PATCH] Minor printf fix

2003-02-01 Thread Nick Glencross
Nicholas Clark wrote: I've just found this in my mailbox. Presumably that means that nobody applied it. However, I can't find the bit of packfile that used to have this, so I presume that the unimplemented wordsize transforms were implemented at some point in the past 9 months. :-) Thanks for th

Re: [PATCH] Minor printf fix

2003-02-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nicholas Clark wrote: *** packfile.c 20 May 2002 01:28:32 - 1.48 if(self->need_wordsize) { return 0; I presume that the unimplemented wordsize transforms were implemented at some point in the past 9 months. :-) Yep, mostly in my last two packfile patches this week.

Re: [PATCH] Minor printf fix

2003-02-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 04:35:18PM +0100, Nick Glencross wrote: > here's a small fix to a printf which I sometimes trigger. Looks like a > ')' and '\n' went missing. Feel free to adjust it to meets coding standards. > Index: packfile.c > ==

AW: AW: Sabbatical from the list

2003-02-01 Thread Murat Ünalan
> > Apocalypse 6 and Exgenesis 6. Please do a search on > perl.com for 1-5. > s/en// > > Exegesis \Ex`e*ge"sis\, n.; pl. Exegeses. [NL., fr.Gr. ?,fr. ? >to explain, interpret; ? out + ? to guide, lead, akin, to ? >to lead. See Agent.] >1. Exposition; explanation;

Re: AW: Sabbatical from the list

2003-02-01 Thread Luke Palmer
> X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 04:49:21 -0500 > From: "Joseph F. Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Accept-Language: en-us, en > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.20, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/ > > Mu

Re: AW: Sabbatical from the list

2003-02-01 Thread Joseph F. Ryan
Murat Ünalan wrote: It is likely that I will start reading again after A6 and E6 Sorry for uninformedness, but what is "A6" and "E6" ? Any versioning of p6 dev releases ? Murat Apocalypse 6 and Exgenesis 6. Please do a search on perl.com for 1-5.

AW: Sabbatical from the list

2003-02-01 Thread Murat Ünalan
> It is likely that I will start reading again after A6 and E6 Sorry for uninformedness, but what is "A6" and "E6" ? Any versioning of p6 dev releases ? Murat