In summary, I am proposing that one marks
variables that are to be automatically
passed from sub to sub with 'is yours'
where appropriate.
An example of what I'm suggesting follows.
Code with brief comments first then explanation.
{
my $_; # $_ can't be touched
First, I'd like to confirm I've understood
C and C right:
1. C dynamically scopes changes to a
variable's value to the enclosing block.
It does not dynamically scope the name.
The variable can obviously be a global.
It can also make sense if it is lexical.
Is the latter currently al
> [temp]
> [implicit args]
Here's a snippet of conversation on a
haskell list about implementation of
implicit args : http://tinyurl.com/2ym1
--
ralph
First, I'd like to confirm I've understood
C and C right:
1. C dynamically scopes changes to a
variable's value to the enclosing block.
It does not dynamically scope the name.
The variable can obviously be a global.
It can also make sense if it is lexical.
Is the latter currently al
# New Ticket Created by kj Woolley
# Please include the string: [perl #18637]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18637 >
Hello Dan and folks,
I've been reading through the PDDs, and I'm really quite impresse
When's the long double "KNOWN ISSUE" going to be fixed? What's the work
around, just to build a perl with NV==double? I've looked around, can't
find anything about it except in KNOWN_ISSUES (only match in RT is
"Parrot_sprintf-related stuff"). Scan of the archives turns up nothing.
Thanks,
Dav
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:34:47PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Smylers) writes:
: > >... they believed that the + should concatenate the two strings.
: > >
: > > Makes perfect sense to me.
: >
: > Makes sense in a language where variables are typed
:
: It also makes sense
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:34:47PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
>I could mention some other
> languages (or at least, a language (of which I'm becoming considerably
> more fond as I get to know it (especially having just come back from
> Japan (excuse the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Smylers) writes:
> >... they believed that the + should concatenate the two strings.
> >
> > Makes perfect sense to me.
>
> Makes sense in a language where variables are typed
It also makes sense in a language where values are typed. They just
have to be slightly more stro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph F. Ryan) writes:
> Are these people serious? What on earth is the point?
I suggest a Tern versus Rindolf shootout.
--
An algorithm must be seen to be believed.
-- D.E. Knuth
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:02:57PM -0800, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
This:
> - radix > 36, only colon form is allowed, not alpha digits
implies that this:
> 256#0_253_254_255 # base 256, NOT identical!
is actually not allowed, no?
%Anton.
--
| Anton Berezin| FreeBSD: The
I've added a slew of new tests to the p6-literals test-suite, including:
- Error tests.
- Bit-type.
- Subscripted variable interpolation.
- Variable method interpolation.
- Many conversion tests.
I was a bit unsure (read: possibly rong as wrabbits) on some of the error
and conversion tests, so le
# New Ticket Created by Jerome Quelin
# Please include the string: [perl #18622]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18622 >
Well, the topic says it pretty much: befunge now supports the push and
pop instruction
13 matches
Mail list logo
