What's the plan on having properties, or attributes (depending on how
far we're taking it), on individual characters in a string? I think
it's an essential feature, as Lisp has shown us. If there's an
argument otherwise, I'm all ears.
Luke
While working on ...something... I found the need to be able to tell if a
key exists in a PerlHash. Here's the kicker, I don't know what kind of
data's gonna be there: int, float, PMC, or string.
After hunting around in t/perlhash.t I found a few examples of checking for
keys that don't exist.
Me wrote:
> > Somebody fairly recently recommended some decent fixed-width
> > typefaces. I think it may have been MJD ...
>
> Michael Schwern recently suggested "Monaco, Neep or, if you can find
> them, Mishawaka or ProFont".
Ah, yes. That's what I was failing to recollect. (Apologies to bot
The ops described in PDD 6 and docs/parrot_assembly.pod for
scratchpads appear to be subtly different from the ones actually in
core.ops. In particular, i was led astray by the docs referring to the
"newpad" op and core.ops implementing "new_pad". which is it supposed
to be? =)
I started investiga
> Somebody fairly recently recommended some decent fixed-width
typefaces.
> I think it may have been MJD, but I can't find the reference right now
> (could be at work).
Michael Schwern recently suggested "Monaco,
Neep or, if you can find them, Mishawaka or ProFont".
I investigated and found this
If memory serves me right, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> > It looks like we're going to need 8,16,32,64 bit types...
>
> Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
> for floating point numbers?
IL (Ecma-335)
--
134.1.1 Floating Point
14 The floa
"Bryan C. Warnock" wrote:
> Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
> for floating point numbers?
The CLI has three floating point types, of which 2 are visible
to C# and a third is used by the engine. These are "float32",
"float64", and "native float". The firs
If memory serves me right, Leon Brocard wrote:
> It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> Parrot. Could be interesting:
> http://www.dotgnu.org/pipermail/developers/2002-October/008345.html
A condensed summary of the IRC meetings have been posted as :-
http://www.dotgnu.org
Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
While working on ...something... I found the need to be able to tell if
a key exists in a PerlHash. Here's the kicker, I don't know what kind
of data's gonna be there: int, float, PMC, or string.
[ snipp ]
exists Px[key], branch
PDD02 specifies the needed m
Larry Wall wrote:
> $a .! $b # bitwise xor
> $a ! $b # logical xor
> ! $b # logical not
>
> I like the notion that binary ! means that the two sides are sharing
> one "not". That's the definition of XOR in a nutshell.
I like that too. It also means that C and C<.!!> become
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> Parrot. Could be interesting:
It was quite interesting. I managed to make it to the early one and
Dan to the later one. An "annotated and abridged chatlog" is available:
http
Simon Glover wrote:
-for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
+for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
I'm wondering, how I could miss this.
Anyway, thank you for the report, fix checked in.
leo
Erik Lechak:
# And in my tinkering around, I compile a lot. I have also added this
# handy little perl script that helps.
#
# I only know that it works on win32 (XP). I could get it working on
# linux if anyone is interested.
#
# Extensions are in win32 speak. But it uses Config.pm so it sho
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 07:39, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> > Parrot. Could be interesting:
>
> It was quite interesting. I managed to make it to the early one and
> Dan to the la
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On 2002-10-17 at 22:52:49, Smylers wrote:
>
> > ... I initially misread the bar as an exclamation mark. I realize
> > that this is a sample size of one ...
>
> Make that a sample size of two.
Well, not really. (Presumably there are many other people who also read
Larry's m
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> PDD02 specifies the needed methods
>
> exists_keyed
> type_keyed
The vtable PDD refers to type_keyed returning the type of the *PMC*. This
isn't accurate given the question. Should we change the PDD ?
> perlhash/arr
16 matches
Mail list logo
