At 9:02 PM +0100 10/11/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:30:33PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:10 PM +0200 10/10/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>There are also 2 operand math operations of dubious achievement:
>Each of them will be doubled for each RHS INT argument givin
At 12:25 PM -0700 10/11/02, Brent Dax wrote:
Argh. It looks like all the tests on PPC with the varargs core are
failing, but the test with the PMC core (t/op/string.t #96) isn't. I
don't get it--are they *trying* to make varargs impossible to use?!?
No, that's just a happy side-effect. :)
Da
At 3:19 PM -0400 10/11/02, Erik Lechak wrote:
Since I am writing, I have a few stupid questions for you guys
(sorry, I hope that by asking these question others won't have to):
1) I subscribed to the perl6 mailing list, I get two of each
message. One addressed to me and the other cc'd to perl6
On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 05:11 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
my MyClass $obj = .new;
my new MyClass $obj;
Thanks for the clarification. I like those two OK, personally. If I
were chained to one of those, I wouldn't chew my leg off.
Tying it together with the other thread to mak
> Brent, what do you need to help work this out? Is there anyone out
> there who could loan a PPC account to Brent, or perhaps be familiar
> enough with stdarg to take a look directly? (Or how about some
> grizzled grayhair who can tell us if this approach is doomed for
> portability reasons? Not
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:30:33PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 7:10 PM +0200 10/10/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >
> >There are also 2 operand math operations of dubious achievement:
> >Each of them will be doubled for each RHS INT argument giving ~25 opcodes.
>
> Those are all for the:
>
>
Brent Dax:
# Can someone with a PPC box try to figure out why this is happening?
#
# /op/string.# Failed test (t/op/string.t at line
# 1224)
# # got: '-1.13014e-302
# # -1.13014e-302
# # '
# # expected: '80.43
# # -1.1
# # '
#
Aldo Calpini wrote:
>
>
>www.cygwin.com
>
>full-blown command-line CVS. you won't miss *nix again ;-)
>
>
I downloaded version 1.2 of WinCVS and that cvs.exe supports pserver. I
just wanted to ensure that the instructions I give on the guide are
accurate. Now I specify the 1.2 version in
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:21:38PM +0100, Aaron Crane wrote:
: > Vaguely heretical, I know, but I'd be inclined to do something like this:
: >
: > Perl 5 Proposed Perl 6
: > $x && $y $x & $y
: > $x || $y $x | $y
:
: Larry just added
Andy Dougherty:
# On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
#
# > Can you try this?
# >
# > (at the top of the function...)
# > va_list *arg = (va_list *) & (obj->data);
# > (vararg accesses should look like...)
# > va_arg(*arg, ...);
# > (no end-of-function assignment should be n
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:21:38PM +0100, Aaron Crane wrote:
> Vaguely heretical, I know, but I'd be inclined to do something like this:
>
> Perl 5 Proposed Perl 6
> $x && $y $x & $y
> $x || $y $x | $y
Larry just added nice character doubling ops to be more consistent and
here you
On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 01:10 AM, Simon Cozens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Lazzaro) writes:
>> -- A way to submit fixes & new stuff.
>> -- The ability to add (threaded) comments & questions,
>> to encourage less important discussions off perl6-language.
>>
At 7:10 PM +0200 10/10/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>There are also 2 operand math operations of dubious achievement:
>
>5 add
>2 sub
>4 mul
>1 div
>2 mod
>
>Each of them will be doubled for each RHS INT argument giving ~25 opcodes.
Those are all for the:
a op= b
form. There's a minor benef
At 9:11 AM -0700 10/11/02, Steve Fink wrote:
>Brent, what do you need to help work this out? Is there anyone out
>there who could loan a PPC account to Brent, or perhaps be familiar
>enough with stdarg to take a look directly? (Or how about some
>grizzled grayhair who can tell us if this approach
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:57:01AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
>
> > Can you try this?
> >
> > (at the top of the function...)
> > va_list *arg = (va_list *) & (obj->data);
> > (vararg accesses should look like...)
> > va_arg(*arg, ...);
>
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17865]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17865 >
One of the comments in trace.c has got separated from the function it's
describing.
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #17864]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17864 >
Brent's sprintf patch introduced a couple of new warnings here:
exceptions.c: In f
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Leon Brocard wrote:
>
> > Leopold Toetsch sent the following bits through the ether:
> >
> >
> >>So I rewrote the base routines almost from scratch and have currently a
> >>file named list.c
> >>
> >
> > I for one am confused as to t
Josef Hook wrote:
>
>>- can handle sparse arrays, saving many MBs for very sparse arrays
>>
>
> What is the complexity on the algoritm?
Here is a snippet docu, from my recent changes, not checked in yet:
[ get_chunk ... locate List_chunk, calc index in chunk ]
* The scheme of opera
> - can handle sparse arrays, saving many MBs for very sparse arrays
What is the complexity on the algoritm?
/Josef
Larry Wall writes:
> Alternately, we take | and & away from bitwise ops and do something
> more useful with them.
I for one would be extremely happy to see that happen. Giving the bitwise
operations single-character names, while reasonable in the historical
context of (B and) C, suggests that th
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 06:52:25PM +, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
> # Please include the string: [perl #17844]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17844 >
>
>
> The com
A probably GC related bug emerged with the new sprintf code.
Putting "sweepoff" in front of the PASM avoids the bug.
Running various tests with the -d flag SIGSEGVs at printing memory
statistics:
$ time parrot -d t/pmc/intlist_6.pbc
*** Parrot VM: Debugging enabled. ***
*** Parrot VM: Setting u
> [proposal for delegation syntax, drawing from Class::Delegation]
>
> If something is part of the method interface, it ought to be declared
> as a method.
>
> method steer is really(Wheel) is also(???) { .profit!!! }
That's tidy, and is sorta on the lines of my own initial thoughts.
But afa
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 05:03 PM, Trey Harris wrote:
> In a message dated Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Michael Lazzaro writes:
>
>>
>> Uh-oh: my life is gonna suck. I've spent days hunting obscure bugs
>> that were caused by a single mistyped character. Now I'll be spending
>> days hunting obsc
Erik Lechak wrote:
> Yep I cut and pasted it right from my console. I'll download the newest
> realease and try it again and try v1.2. If someone could tell me where
> to get cvs for windows without all the GUI that would be great.
www.cygwin.com
full-blown command-line CVS. you won't miss *n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Lazzaro) writes:
> -- A way to submit fixes & new stuff.
> -- The ability to add (threaded) comments & questions,
> to encourage less important discussions off perl6-language.
> -- Problem/Solution ratings for recipes that everyone
>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:12:03AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I did post 3 major proposals for the next big changes in parrot
> internals - but I'm lacking somehow final answers on these.
>
> There seems to be a general consens to do these changes though.
>
> So here is a summary of the ne
Ok, it's only been 24 hours and I've already decided this needs
extending. People like the concept, but want a way to more easily
contribute to it. And as it turns out, it's not as entirely useless as
I had feared. :-)
So I'm completely reversing what I just told a bunch of people via
email.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:06:54PM -0400, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> At 7:42 PM -0700 10/8/02, Steve Fink wrote:
>>>Thanks, applied.
>>>
>>>Who came up with the idea of two-argument ne, anyway? That's kind of
>>>bizarre.
>>
>> Definitely bizarre. I think
> Known issue. Right now, the code behind Parrot::Test::c_output_is
> doesn't work on Windows. But thanks for reporting this--had we not
> known about it already, it probably would have thrown us into a blind
> panic. :^)
I remember that the testers for cygwin was necessary.
Is they necessary
31 matches
Mail list logo
