Dan Sugalski wrote:
First I want to thank you, for all the checkins.
(Please don't forget #17143, which makes predereferencing working)
> Do we have any idea why GC's getting in the way here? I presume we have
> GC bug, so we ought to track it down if we can.
I can only bring some hints:
-
At 4:15 PM + 9/11/02, Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
>This patch eliminates identical function bodies in core_ops_prederef.*
>thus saving ~ 160 KB per executable.
>s. also comment in patch.
Applied, thanks.
--
Dan
---
At 2:12 PM +0200 9/10/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>"perl6 --test -r" runs (i.e. executes inside imcc) _all_ perl6 tests
>(including t/compiler/8_5.p6) now correctly, _if_ GC is turned off.
Do we have any idea why GC's getting in the way here? I presume we
have GC bug, so we ought to track it do
At 7:13 PM + 9/12/02, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
>The following patch installs a signal handler to try to catch the core
>dumps that can follow from Configure's attempts to perform unaligned
>access.
Applied, thanks.
--
Dan
--
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #17233]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17233 >
- %x did return wrong "letters"
- this "continue" looks bogus,
I did a test with "..
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 9:51 AM +0200 9/13/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>> and is a perl6 %h{"a"}[0][1] a PASM P2["a";0;1]?
>
> Yes.
Fine, thought so too, thanks for your quick answer.
I have already a patch for it, I'll make an entry in t/pmc/perlhash.t too.
_But_:
What about all these bo
At 9:51 AM +0200 9/13/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>The same system with a PerlHash doesn't:
[Snip]
>So the question arises to the syntax gurus, should it work like this?
Yes.
>and is a perl6 %h{"a"}[0][1] a PASM P2["a";0;1]?
Yes.
--
Dan
--
At 5:09 PM -0700 9/12/02, David Whipp wrote:
>Aaron Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> I'm thinking XS thoughts because we're going to need a few external
>> things at SOME point It would be so nice if Perl 6's XS
>> was part of the language, rather than an external pre-processor.
Let's first compare with a PerlArray:
(following snippet is from an imcc test file, in PASM syntax)
new P1, .PerlArray
new P0, .PerlArray
set P1[0], P0
set P0[1], 2
set I0, P1[0;1]
print I0=> 2
i.e. "P1[0;.." returns an array PMC, which, indexed by key_next, gives
the
