Re: [perl #16095] [PATCH] pbc2.pl

At 6:32 AM + 8/9/02, Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote: >actually, this is the 2. attempt to get this in. >It resolves tickets #15712 which seems to be closed to early. >Anyway this patch makes e.g. > >$ perl6 -C mops.p6 > >compile and run natively C. Whups, sorry. Patch applied. --

Request for behaviour definition for assignment to PerlScalar

How should the PerlScalar PMC behave in the following situation? new P0, .PerlScalar new P1, .PerlArray assign P0, P1 The assign opcode will call PerlScalar's set_pmc function, which needs to get a value from P1, so it calls PerlArray's X function?? The two obvious options seem to be:

[perl #16095] [PATCH] pbc2.pl

# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #16095] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16095 > Hi, actually, this is the 2. attempt to get this in. It resolves tickets #15712 whi

[COMMIT] PPC JIT

OK, now we have the JIT working on PPC. More opcodes coming. It's not currently using a constant pool but it should. Thanks to Sean for the sync cache code and helping me. Daniel Grunblatt.

Re: never ending story Keyes

At 10:33 PM +0100 8/8/02, Tom Hughes wrote: >In message > Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 6:58 PM +0100 8/8/02, Tom Hughes wrote: >> >> >Presumably with all keys being PMCs we will just encode the key >> >arguments in the opcode name as a k, and kc for constant keys.

A quick reminder to those with commit privs

The dependencies are a bit whacked, still, so... *Please* do a make clean, make, and make test before comitting a patch. -- Dan --"it's like this"--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [

Re: never ending story Keyes

In message Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:58 PM +0100 8/8/02, Tom Hughes wrote: > > >Presumably with all keys being PMCs we will just encode the key > >arguments in the opcode name as a k, and kc for constant keys. > > Yep. > > >Likewise, the constant keys will presu

Re: Array vs. PerlArray

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 03:28:18PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 11:00 AM -0700 8/8/02, Steve Fink wrote: > >Oh, yeah. The perl6 summary reminded me: I forgot to mention that this > >would also make $a[-6] (or @a[-6] if you're writing perl6) on a > >4-element array throw an exception instead of

[perl #16087] [PATCH] Scratchpad pmc

# New Ticket Created by Jonathan Sillito # Please include the string: [perl #16087] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16087 > The main purpose of this patch is to give scratchpads a pointer to their parent pad

Re: [perl #16085] [PATCH] perlundef.pmc

Leopold Toetsch wrote: (via RT) > this one was left over. > Please apply. > > --- perlundef.pmc Sun Jul 28 13:33:34 2002 > +++ /home/lt/src/parrot-007/classes/perlundef.pmc Thu Aug 8 20:11:49 2002 Thanks Leopold; I have applied this, along with the changes to perlint, perlnum and perlstring tha

Re: Array vs. PerlArray

At 12:43 PM -0700 8/8/02, Steve Fink wrote: >Wow, this thread is looking bad -- I'm replying to my own reply to my >own message. Sorry; I accidentally hit reply instead of reply to list, >and from the resulting off-list discussion with Sean O'Rourke I have >updated the patch. I won't resend it, be

Re: PMC assignment stuff

At 10:13 AM +0100 8/8/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:21:54AM +0200, Peter Gibbs wrote: > > Should a PerlScalar have its own vtable which acts as appropriate >> depending on current content, or should it switch vtables as the >> content changes? If the latter, do we have s

Re: Array vs. PerlArray

At 11:00 AM -0700 8/8/02, Steve Fink wrote: >Oh, yeah. The perl6 summary reminded me: I forgot to mention that this >would also make $a[-6] (or @a[-6] if you're writing perl6) on a >4-element array throw an exception instead of autoextending the array, >wrapping around to a valid element, or explo

Re: Array vs. PerlArray

Wow, this thread is looking bad -- I'm replying to my own reply to my own message. Sorry; I accidentally hit reply instead of reply to list, and from the resulting off-list discussion with Sean O'Rourke I have updated the patch. I won't resend it, because it may require more changes and it's gotte

[perl #16085] [PATCH] perlundef.pmc

# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #16085] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16085 > Hi, this one was left over. Please apply. leo -- attachment 1 -