Josef Höök wrote:
>
> i found some strange behaviour in perlarray.pmc
> Consider this code:
>
> new P0, .PerlArray, 2 # P0[2]
> set P0, 2, 1 # P0[2] = 1
> set P0, -4, 1 # P0[-4] = 1
>
> # Above runs some strange code:
> # ix += SELF->cache.int_val
>
On Monday 01 July 2002 02:30 pm, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "AW" == Ashley Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AW> Also, where does $() come in? Is statement scalarification ever
> AW> useful outside a string?
>
> it is the same as scalar() in perl5. it provides scalar context if used
> ou
> "AW" == Ashley Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AW> Also, where does $() come in? Is statement scalarification ever
AW> useful outside a string?
it is the same as scalar() in perl5. it provides scalar context if used
outside a string.
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 30 June 2002 09:09 pm, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Ashley Winters wrote:
> > I don't know how the grammars are going, and I'm not fit to write one
> > myself,
>
> Hey, neither am I, but that hasn't stopped me from taking a stab or two,
> figuring that through pain comes f
At 06:59 PM 6/30/2002 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>of the ARM procedure call standard. The solution there is to always
>keep one chunk in reserve - when you move back out of a chunk you don't
>free it. Instead you wait until you move back another chunk and then
>free the chunk after the one that has
Current p6 rx syntax aiui regarding embedded code:
/
#1 do (may include an explicit fail):
{ code }
#2 do with implicit 'or fail'
<( code )>
#3 interp lit:
$( { code } )
#4 interp as rx:
<{ code }>
/
This feels cryptic. Do we need abbreviated syntax for
--
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 21:09:40
Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Ashley Winters wrote:
>
>> I don't know how the grammars are going, and I'm not fit to write one
>> myself,
>
>Hey, neither am I, but that hasn't stopped me from taking a stab or two,
>figuring that through pain comes
At 6:59 PM +0100 6/30/02, Tom Hughes wrote:
>There is a performance issue in the stack code, which the attached
>patch attempts to address.
[Snip]
>Some figures from my test programs, running on a K6-200 linux box. The
>test programs push and pop 65536 times with the first column being when
>tha
At 1:49 PM -0500 6/29/02, brian wheeler wrote:
>This patch implements a typeof op which returns the integer type or
>string type of a PMC.
Applied, thanks.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski
me again,
At the moment based on Apo1->4 no ex's "walked" yet.
- There is a questions inside feel free to answer ... [?? ... ??]
- Also links for other reference implementation will be good.
- Also feel free to correct my english :")
What's new ?
Let me first mention this is in no means ful
For some reason I feel really, really bad saying this --
in fact, I'm warming up the flog right now -- but, um,
maybe Damian should write it?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
(I don't have the original msg in my mbox, so I'm jumping in here...)
The following is from the Tcl bytecode compiler [1] FAQ:
Why doesn't Tcl use the Java bytecodes?
I [2] had originally hoped to use Java bytecodes because they have a
mature design and because Java is widely available. I cho
Hi.
Some questions I got when start looking to PMC's:
- Is there planned a set PMC? If not, a parrot application can't create
it's own PMC?
- There are PMC examples other than the test suite?
Thanks for the good work ;)
Alberto
--
Alberto Manuel B. Simoes
Departamento de Informática - Univer
13 matches
Mail list logo