On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:27:08PM -0500, Allison Randal wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> >
> > LAST Executes on implicit loop exit or call to last()
> > Loop variables may be unknown
>
> Not exactly "unknown". It's just that, in a few cases, their v
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
>
> LAST Executes on implicit loop exit or call to last()
> Loop variables may be unknown
Not exactly "unknown". It's just that, in a few cases, their values may
have changed by the time the LAST block is executed.
> And I th
At 10:11 PM -0700 5/6/02, Erik Steven Harrison wrote:
>On Mon, 6 May 2002 16:26:16
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>*Alot of good answers to questions*
>
>Appreciate the descent from the mountain to help clear things up down here.
You're certainly welcome for the answers. (And while the internals
list
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:44:03PM -0700, Mark Kvale wrote:
>
> To compare schemes (A), (B), and (C), I implemented each of them. I
> created a common parser for the three schemes that recognizes the
> basics: ^, $, ., a, \a, [a], [^a], ab, a|b, a*, a+, a? and (a). The
> parsed regex can be conv
Aaron Sherman writes:
: On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 12:37, Larry Wall wrote:
: > Piers Cawley writes:
: > : Consider the following.
: > :
: > :sub foo {...}
: > :
: > :foo *@ary;
: > :foo * @ary;
: > :
: > : Is this another place where whitespace will have meaning? Or should I
: > : add p
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:38:00PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
> (FYI, I'm the main author of Parrot's rx package.)
>
> Mark Kvale:
> # computes dynamically several functions, such as length of the
> # regex match string, that are precomputed in the reg code...
> #
> # Note that the overhead/match
At 9:26 AM -0400 5/7/02, Aaron Sherman wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 16:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> I forgot to announce the call for questions here (sorry), but the
>> answers 9and the questions) to the first round of Ask The Parrot have
>> been posted over on use.perl.
>> http://use.perl.org/
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Melvin Smith wrote:
> The broken 64bit systems seem to be related to compiling
> Parrot with a different wordsize than Perl5, since I'm currently
> getting byteorder from Perl5 Config.pm.
>
> I guess we will have to compute it ourselves after Parrot
> has picked what type to
I have been following this thread, but I would just like to inject a summary
of the various related UPPERCASE blocks
PREExecutes on block entry.
Loop variables are in a known state
POST Executes on block exit.
Loop variables are in a known state
NEXT Executes on impli
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 12:37, Larry Wall wrote:
> Piers Cawley writes:
> : Consider the following.
> :
> :sub foo {...}
> :
> :foo *@ary;
> :foo * @ary;
> :
> : Is this another place where whitespace will have meaning? Or should I
> : add parentheses to disambiguate? Enquiring minds
On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 14:21, David Whipp wrote:
> Miko O'Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Sorry, I thought I'd expressed agreement at some point. I like the
> > "else\s+(if|while|for|loop)" construct very much, and I think the
> > programmers of the world would like it too. I know
On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 16:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I forgot to announce the call for questions here (sorry), but the
> answers 9and the questions) to the first round of Ask The Parrot have
> been posted over on use.perl.
> http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/06/179233 for the interested.
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley writes:
> : Consider the following.
> :
> :sub foo {...}
> :
> :foo *@ary;
> :foo * @ary;
> :
> : Is this another place where whitespace will have meaning? Or should I
> : add parentheses to disambiguate? Enquiring minds want to
13 matches
Mail list logo
