Mike Lambert:
(a bunch of stuff about regexes)
No offense intended, but I had trouble understanding that, and I helped
come up with the thing. :^) So, I'll try to interpret.
In Perl 5, we came up against the problem of simply running out of
characters in regexes. To deal with this, Larry came
Since A5 is the next thing up, it's probably worthwhile to try and get any
changes we want to regexes before they get finalized. :)
The (?something .. ) syntax which was used to extend the lifetime of the
parenthesis in Perl5 was due to the lack of matched delimiters.
With a little discussion th
Trey Harris wrote:
>
> In a message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Dave Storrs writes:
> > sub load_data ( \$filename; $version; @_ ) {
>
> I think you can do exactly this with
> sub load_data ( $filename is rw, $version, @_ ) {
>
> Yes? Or maybe
> sub load_data ( $filename is r
> > - None of the JIT ports implement it. This will save work.
>
> As long as my JITed jumptables are fast.
If you like coding assembly :-)
>
> > - It is in general impossible for an optimizer to determine
> > where the branch targets are if you allow registers as
> > branch
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> G'day all.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:44:49AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > Ah. Hmmm. Well, we're already attaching some metadata to ops in a
> > different way--that's what the op and inline keywords are doing. For
> > metadata that use param
This one got dropped too, and maybe this isn't the right place for
this anymore.
Index: TODO
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/TODO,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 TODO
--- TODO29 Jan 2002 22:13:33 - 1.9
+++
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:24:58PM +1000, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> G'day all.
>
> This patch introduces a new op parameter type "inconst", which is like
> "in" except that it only produces const versions of the op (i.e. it
> will not take values from registers).
Should it be all one keyword, or
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:11:31PM +0200, Marco Baringer wrote:
> Jason Gloudon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So thus far, goto ADDRESS(X) means set the program counter to the pointer value
> > X.
>
> ok, but i find this highly counter-intuitive.
I used to use this. I kept my own return add
Brent Dax wrote in perl.perl6.language :
>
> I'm working on a preliminary version right now. So far it's been
> surprisingly easy--touches toke.c, perly.y, opcode.pl, pp.c, and
> pp_hot.c. (Of course, it's also off an old bleadperl, but I doubt those
> files change that actively.)
Work on a mo
I also recommend: http://www.parrotcode.org/
Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
>
> On 19 Apr 2002, Alberto Manuel [ISO-8859-1] Brandão Simões wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm thinking to use Parrot to be the 'virtual machine' for a
> > specification language developed at Minho's university. Probably,
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, this is incorrect. goto ADDRESS should go to an absolute address,
> period. It's for use in those times when you *have* an absolute
> address--for example when you've just fetched the address of a
> subroutine from a symbol table.
but what do i put
On 19 Apr 2002, Alberto Manuel [ISO-8859-1] Brandão Simões wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I'm thinking to use Parrot to be the 'virtual machine' for a
> specification language developed at Minho's university. Probably, it
> will have two languages syntax (an for historic reasons, and another
> (VDM-SL)
Hi all!
I'm thinking to use Parrot to be the 'virtual machine' for a
specification language developed at Minho's university. Probably, it
will have two languages syntax (an for historic reasons, and another
(VDM-SL) because it is a standard). Why Parrot? Well.. I like perl and
would like to conn
Hi,
We are compiling some esql files(.ec ) files using "purify" with the -g option.
The problem which we are facing is that the log files that are generated after running
the purified executable shows some error of the sort as given under :
==
Mike Lambert wrote:
> Undoing the patch in resources.c seems to fix the problem.
>
> Changing:
> ((Buffer *)buffer)->buflen = req_size;
> to:
> ((Buffer *)buffer)->buflen = size;
> makes it work again.
Just for interest, the problem here is that the rounding is always up to the
next multi
Also slowing down 0.0.99 so that 0.1.0 has atleast 2-3 times speed up over 0.0.99 :"))
|I don't see "World Domination" or "Nervous Breakdown" in there anywhere.
Andrew J Bromage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> G'day all.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 07:06:04AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>
>> If I'm going to be doing tail call optimization
>> (and I can't call it scheme if I don't) then my first thought was as
>> follows.
>>
>> # This is a tail call
>>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
