> #$bar = \$foo;
> new P1, PerlRef
> stash_load P0, "foo" #Not needed if P0 unchanged
> set P1, P0 #Make P1 reference P0 (not 'foo')
> stash_store P1, "bar"
My original example was like that, but I wasn't sure if that was a proper
use of 'set', since 'set' normally copies one into the other
"Michel J Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This depends upon how variables and the registers interact. If, like a
>real CPU, registers must be stored back into traditional memory as
>variables, then there is no problem.
>If instead, registers are aliased onto traditional memory variables,
I just committed 0.0.4 update to the Cola compiler.
Besides minor code cleanups, new features are:
Bitwise operators <<, >>, |, &, ~, ^
Logical operators &&, ||
Complex conditionals:
Logical expressions do lazy left right evaluation in the
standard C style.
if(i == 0 || j == 0 || k == 0) {
Mostly announcing the new pumpking, updating the PDD list, and updating
the status page with language information and current PMC status. Other
changes to come tomorrow night, but the important stuff is up.
--
Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 1:19 on 04/02/2002 EST, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran across the following errors while running pod2html over the PDDs:
The errors from "podchecker" were better about line numbers, but still,
this was helpful.
> [parrot@damogran pdd]$ pod2html pdd00_pdd.pod >pdd00_pdd.html
> [parr
At 01:48 AM 4/2/2002 -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote:
> Added macros for working with the interpreter->flags structure, following
> the _SET/_CLEAR/_TEST convention from pdd07.
Nice cleanup.
-Melvin
--- Forwarded Message
Date:02 Apr 2002 06:24:19 +
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: parrot/io io.c io_win32.c
cvsuser 02/04/01 22:24:19
Modified:.core.ops embed.c interpreter.c runops_cores.c
include/parrot
> Remember that the higher level (eg perl6) will expect to be able to find the
> PMC afterwards. For example:
>
> $foo = "abc";
> $bar = \$foo;
> print $$bar;
> $foo = 3;
> print $$bar;
This depends upon how variables and the registers interact. If, like a
real CPU, registers must be stored back
I ran across the following errors while running pod2html over the PDDs:
[parrot@damogran pdd]$ pod2html pdd00_pdd.pod >pdd00_pdd.html
[parrot@damogran pdd]$ pod2html pdd01_overview.pod >pdd01_overview.html
/usr/bin/pod2html: pdd01_overview.pod: unexpected =item directive in
paragraph 16. ignorin
I can't concat strings to a PerlString, I have to assign the constant
string to another PerlString to do the concat...
Is this just that a suitable entry in perlstring.pmc needs to be
created?
-
new P6, PerlString
set S1, " stuff\n"
# This would fail
# concat P6, P6, S1
# but put
At 10:31 PM 4/1/2002 -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>What is this supposed to do? It breaks the tcc build, and generally looks
>ungood to me.
sleep(1) is an optimization ?
Is this the real Simon Cozens? :)
Is this a pop quiz??
Did you see that gremlin..
-Melvin
What is this supposed to do? It breaks the tcc build, and generally looks
ungood to me.
--Josh
At 18:03 on 04/01/2002 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> cvsuser 02/04/01 10:03:29
>
> Modified:.core.ops
> Log:
> Minor optimization
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.1
Committed, thanks. (makes things ugly, but hopefully we'll be replacing
the makefile with something more perlish down the road)
--Josh
At 16:17 on 04/01/2002 EST, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, here's the necessary fixes to the VMS hints and Makefile.in to get
> VMS to Con
Robin Houston writes:
: Are there any plans to change the regex syntax for Perl 6?
That's what the next apocalypse is about.
: I ask because I've spent the last few days playing with PCRE,
: and I added a rather powerful extension to it as an experiment.
: Details at http://www.puffinry.freeserv
I'm well aware of the date, but this is no April Fool's Joke. (Well
perhaps it is, but the joke would be on me.) A new version of BASIC can be
found at http://geeksalad.org/basic
This BASIC has a few interesting things over the last one. I/O now works
(INPUT, LOAD, etc...) as well as intera
> If my proposal has a hidden agenda, it's that I want to show that
> you can get a lot of the power we want without actually having to
> embed arbitrary code.
In general, however, I think that embedding code in regexes is a *very*
good idea. Sure you can get a lot of power without it, but it is
Are there any plans to change the regex syntax for Perl 6?
I ask because I've spent the last few days playing with PCRE,
and I added a rather powerful extension to it as an experiment.
Details at http://www.puffinry.freeserve.co.uk/regex-extension.html
Named capture-blocks are *long* overdue as
Ok, here's the necessary fixes to the VMS hints and Makefile.in to get
VMS to Configure and have MMS parse the resulting Makefile. It
includes all the stuff I posted eariler today.
- There *must* be a space between the target, colon and dependencyes
foo: bar*wrong*
foo :
DECC's make utility, MMS, speaks a very, very strict and unforgiving
dialect of make. It's very useful for finding things like macros
defined twice or missing targets:
$ mms
%MMS-W-MBREDEFILL, Illegal attempt to redefine macro 'LD'
test : $(TEST_PROG) assemble.pl .test_dummy
%MMS-W-DRV
The patch below fixes a very basic Makefile syntax error (on VMS
anyway). MMS requires that there be at least one space between the
target and the colon.
http://www.openvms.compaq.com:8000/73FINAL/5825/5825_.htm
You begin a target or source line in column 1 of the line and use
the keywor
My research was right. You *can't* mix Unix and VMS style include
paths on VMS. It will just dumbly concatinate them.
CC/DECC /include=[.include]
Result: [.include]parrot/parrot.h *wrong*
CC/DECC /include="./include"
Result: ./include/parrot/parrot.h *right*
Perl5 simply avoids
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 04:37:54PM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
> Nicholas Clark:
> # Patching file Makefile.in using Plan A...
> # Hunk #1 succeeded at 112.
> # Hunk #2 failed at 143.
>
> Weird. Line endings, perhaps.
This line has appeared in Makefile.in, which doesn't seem to be in your patch:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 07:00:57AM -0800, Charles Bunders wrote:
> Checking some things by compiling and running another small C program (this
> could take a while):
>
> Building ./testparrotsizes.cfrom testparrotsizes_c.in...
>
> #include "parrot/parrot.h"
> ..^
> %CC-F-NOINCLFILE
Configure.pl had a few problems. Thought I would send it to the list. Below
this is a 'perl -"V"' if you want to know that info.
Thanks...
Parrot Version 0.0.4 Configure
Copyright (C) 2001-2002 Yet Another Society
Since you're running this script, you obviously have
Perl 5--I'll be pulling s
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 21:41, Michel J Lambert wrote:
> > > Too late. I'm going there... :)
> > Good for you. I was hoping transformations could make it :)
>
> Why didn't you chime in support before, then? I feel like Aaron and I are
> the only ones who are opinionated on this matter...
Hopefully
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:33:02AM -0300, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> Did you continue working on this or can I take this patch to continue?
I haven't made any changes since then so you can work off this patch.
--
Jason
26 matches
Mail list logo
