[josh-003.patch]
This patch adds some missing const's to silence a number of gcc warnings.
--Josh
Index: include/parrot/warnings.h
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/include/parrot/warnings.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1
Sorry, I goofed on that last patch- corrected version (including rx.h this
time):
[josh-002.patch]
This patch rolls up all my current outstanding patches.
- add makefile target and script to test for external libc dependencies
- fix return values in hash and array PMCs (returning 0 in a
Daniel,
I've actually got something equivalent for the inline portion of your
patch in the patch I just sent to the list.
As far as the ssize_t part, yeah, this probably belongs in config.h_in or
parrot.h or something.
--Josh
At 0:30 on 02/18/2002 +0100, "Ritz Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Bravo!
PDD 7 (coding standards) is also still MIA, although i understand that it's
basically complete.
--Josh
At 16:18 on 02/17/2002 GMT, Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just starting to think about writing something on the history and
> evolution of Parrot's design, and came
This patch rolls up all my current patches which haven't yet been applied:
- add makefile target and script to test for external libc dependencies
- fix return values in hash and array PMCs (returning 0 in a void func)
- remove unnecessary data pointer <=> function pointer conversions
On Sunday 17 February 2002 17:18, Simon Cozens wrote:
> Yes, I'm being an anal retentive asshole. It's my job.
Nah, this time you are not ;P
On to the pdds ...
There seems to be some part missing from pdd2, at the bottom.
And this takes care of the dublicate entries in pdd6, as they seem to ha
this is a quick fix for CPrederef.pm to make to generated code compile with the MS
compiler.
fixes:
- ms compiler allows inline only for c++, for c there's __inline
- ms header files knows nothing about ssize_t
may be this should go into parrot.h??
Index: CPrederef.pm
===
Brent Dax:
> This is the first draft of my proposed regex PDD. Review and advise.
You rock, sir. Analysis in the morning.
--
FAILURE:
When Your Best Just Isn't Good Enough
http://www.despair.com
>-Melvin
>-Melvin
Sorry, I got stuck in a for loop. :)
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 08:54:52PM +0100, Gerson Kurz wrote:
> Besides, wasn't parrot supposed to be a VM and interpret the code,
> rather than just compile-to-c? (And, the code doesn't even look like
> normal C code - it has a "static char program_code[] = {" which it
> executes).
Yes. You're us
At 09:38 PM 2/17/2002 +0100, Gerson Kurz wrote:
>~/parrot>assemble.pl examples/assembly/euclid.pasm >test.pbc
>~/parrot>pbc2c.pl test.pbc >test.c
>Use of uninitialized value in sprintf at lib/Parrot/OpTrans/CGoto.pm line
>97.
>~/parrot>
Just run the bytecode with the interpreter instead.
../test
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Gerson Kurz wrote:
> Hi Brent,
>
> you wrote:
> > Did you follow the directions in the README file? That assemble.pl
> > warning especially makes me very suspicious.
>
> I'm sorry, I got it wrong in the mail. I did the configure/make/make test
> thing. This is what happened:
Hi Brent,
you wrote:
> Did you follow the directions in the README file? That assemble.pl
> warning especially makes me very suspicious.
I'm sorry, I got it wrong in the mail. I did the configure/make/make test
thing. This is what happened:
~/parrot>assemble.pl examples/assembly/euclid.pasm >t
Gerson Kurz:
# I downloaded
#
# http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot_2002-02-17_14.tar.gz
#
# to try fooling around with parrot on cygwin.
#
# 1) Some files are missing, so make.pl fails. Luckily for me I'm not an
# alpha-or-sun-user (missing: jit/sun4/lib.jit and string.jit - they are
This is the first draft of my proposed regex PDD. Review and advise.
--Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parrot Configure pumpking, regex hacker, embedding coder, and all-around
good guy
Check out the Parrot FAQ: http://www.panix.com/~ziggy/parrot.html (no,
it's not mine)
. hawt sysadmin chx0rs
I downloaded
http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot_2002-02-17_14.tar.gz
to try fooling around with parrot on cygwin.
1) Some files are missing, so make.pl fails. Luckily for me I'm not an
alpha-or-sun-user (missing: jit/sun4/lib.jit and string.jit - they are
there in the archive but 0
Simon Cozens:
# Brent Dax:
# > I was afraid you were gonna say that. :^) I'll put it
# back in my next
# > embedding patch.
#
# And document this exchange in the Embedding PDD? :)
I probably will--after I write the regex PDD. :^)
--Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parrot Configure pumpking, regex
Brent Dax:
> I was afraid you were gonna say that. :^) I'll put it back in my next
> embedding patch.
And document this exchange in the Embedding PDD? :)
--
Ever wake up feeling like a null pointer? -Allan Pratt
Dan Sugalski:
# On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
#
# > Melvin Smith:
# > # At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
# > # >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
# > # >-struct Parrot_Interp {
# > # >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
# > # > struct IReg int_reg;
# >
(Ziggy, could you give this a number and commit it to CVS when you have
time? Thanks. I'll update the CVS copy with comments from this thread
when it is done.)
Here's a first approximation at half a PDD, but it should be enough to
chew over. Please note particularly the sections. Thanks.
=head1
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
> Melvin Smith:
> # At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> # >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
> # >-struct Parrot_Interp {
> # >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
> # > struct IReg int_reg;
> # > struct NReg num_reg;
>
Melvin Smith:
# At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
# >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
# >-struct Parrot_Interp {
# >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
# > struct IReg int_reg;
# > struct NReg num_reg;
# > struct SReg string_reg;
# >@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
>Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
>-struct Parrot_Interp {
>+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
> struct IReg int_reg;
> struct NReg num_reg;
> struct SReg string_reg;
>@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
> void *current_package;
I was just starting to think about writing something on the history and
evolution of Parrot's design, and came across some PDDs in the mail archives.
Grief, I remember these things! These were meant to document the design,
what we'd decided, why those decisions were a bad idea, what we chose inste
Steve Fink wrote:
>
> > - key->keys = (KEY_PAIR*)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
> > + key->keys = (KEY_PAIR**)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
>
> That seems rather suspicious. I don't know anything about the KEY_PAIR
> type, but allocating a chunk of memory big e
*sigh*. Gone are the days when this was a simple 500 line Perl script.
I'm trying to add two new output types, and I've got half way through
before tying myself in knots. If anyone can look at my diff and finish
the missing bits, please drop me a mail.
--
In this talk, I would like to speculate
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
> > - key->keys = (KEY_PAIR*)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
> > + key->keys = (KEY_PAIR**)realloc(key->keys,sizeof(KEY_PAIR)*size);
>
> That seems rather suspicious. I don't know anything about the KEY_PAIR
> type, but allocating a chunk
27 matches
Mail list logo
