bignum dev list

2001-11-14 Thread Uri Guttman
we have a new list for bignum development so we won't bother the parrotheads on internals. subscribe by sending email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] the list itself is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] uri -- Uri Guttman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stemsystems.com -- Stem is an

Map and Batch Operations on Arrays

2001-11-14 Thread Shlomi Fish
Those who read Apocalypse 3 (and everybody here should because the Apocalypses describe what we plan to implement) would know that Larry Wall decided to implement batch operations on arrays. Hence it would be possible to add two arrays in order to get a third array whose members equal to the sums

Proper Tail Recursion

2001-11-14 Thread Shlomi Fish
For those who are not familiar with the term, proper tail recursion means that if the last operation of a function is a call to itself only with different argument, than the function simply goes to its beginning. Proper Tail Recursion is harder to debug, but consumes less memory and is faster to

better parrotguts drawing

2001-11-14 Thread Ken Fox
I made a couple changes to the drawing. Stacks and register structures are now a bit more conceptual -- it is much easier to see how they work. See for the latest. Keep in mind that the light blue "frame" stuff at the bottom is experimental. Anybody inte

Re: memory assumptions

2001-11-14 Thread Jason Gloudon
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 06:05:51PM -0500, Michael L Maraist wrote: > treat them separately. We're already having to treat handles differently > than buffer-objects. I'm also wanting to segregate lists of leaf-buffers, Ok here is a reference to the thread that mentioned copy-on-write for shar

RE: Lexical implementation work

2001-11-14 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:12 AM 11/11/2001 -0500, James Mastros wrote: >On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > At 01:39 PM 11/9/2001 -0800, Brent Dax wrote: > > >Dan Sugalski: > > >Of course. Random question only very tangentially related to this: is > > >INTVAL (and thus the I registers) supposed to be big en

Re: Revamping the build system

2001-11-14 Thread Alan Burlison
Paolo Molaro wrote: > > And if we have to use make, then we're back with the very problems of portably > > calling compilers and so on that this supposed new build system was meant to > > avoid. > > I'm going to bite and say the words (and get the flames). > > autoconf automake libtool