o'reilly seems to have a problem with daylight bofs:
I apologize, however, I cannot change the BOF session "Perl 6 Op Code and
Dispatch Loop" to Wednesday during lunch. BOF sessions are available in
the evenings after Convention sessions and ancillary Convention events have
completed. If y
> I've go tired of typing :"), but if I had current index-iterator ( say under
> $i just as example) at hand the way I have $_ i can just type :
>
> print "$_ : $b[$i]\n" for @a;
> OR
> print "$a[$i] : $b[$i]\n" for @a;
>
For a general solution to this see Buddha Buck's RFC on iterators:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:32:13PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 04:28 PM 7/18/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> >well, it seems that thurday night is a bad one for this bof. i will
> >propose wednesday at lunch (12:30 - 2:00 IIRC).
> Works nicely for me.
Sounds OK for me. (Like *I* have a clue
How about
print "$a[$_]:$b[$_] for 0..$#a;
or in the p6 case...
print "@a[$_]:@b[$_]" for 0..$#a;
Ilya
-Original Message-
From: raptor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07/18/2001 12:14 PM
Subject: one more nice2haveit
hi,
As I was programming i got again to one thing i alwas needed to
At 04:28 PM 7/18/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>well, it seems that thurday night is a bad one for this bof. i will
>propose wednesday at lunch (12:30 - 2:00 IIRC).
>
>does that work?
Works nicely for me. Everyone else? (Even if you're not interested in
opcodes per se and more interested in th
well, it seems that thurday night is a bad one for this bof. i will
propose wednesday at lunch (12:30 - 2:00 IIRC).
does that work?
uri
--
Uri Guttman - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.sysarch.com
SYStems ARCHitecture and Stem Development -- http://www.stemsystems.com
> > So, in this case, a "with" synonym for "for" would work.
> >
> Particularly if '$_' was implied... So with Perl 6's '.' replacing '->',
> and 'with' aliasing 'for':
>
>with ( $XL.{Application}.{ActiveSheet} ) {
> .cells(1,1) = "Title";
> .language() = "English";
>}
This is m
> > So, in this case, a "with" synonym for "for" would work.
> >
> Particularly if '$_' was implied... So with Perl 6's '.' replacing '->',
> and 'with' aliasing 'for':
>
>with ( $XL.{Application}.{ActiveSheet} ) {
> .cells(1,1) = "Title";
> .language() = "English";
>}
This is m
Thanks, I tried using MIME-Tools-5.4.11.tar.gz
I'm facing an interesting problem. I'm using the following code to dump the
mail.
Now I'm receiving a file "encrypted.txt" in mail as attachment. The code
works fine & it dumps the contents & the attachment also.
I have set my .procmailrc as
:0 c
|pe
hi,
As I was programming i got again to one thing i alwas needed to have...
especialy when write something fast or debug some result... words comes
about for/foreach and accessing the current-index of the array I'm working
with i.e.
say I have two arrays @a and @b and want to print them (al
>> Does such a thing exist already?
>
>A WTDI exists already:
>
>for ( $XL->{Application}->{ActiveSheet} ) {
> $_->cells(1,1) = "Title";
> $_->language() = "English";
>}
>
>(presuming lvalue-methods, of course...)
So, in this case, a "with" synonym for "for" would work.
]- OR
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:47:31AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I'll certainly be there. If we could get a show of hands, please? (Or
> requests for more info) If the numbers are small, or lots of folks would go
> but are otherwise engaged at that point, we can see about rescheduling.
I'd like
At 08:29 PM 7/17/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>the op code bof has been scheduled for thursday night, 8-10 pm. it is
>not up on the web site yet.
>
>unfortunately it is opposite the p5p impressions bof.
>
>if we are small enough, we could reschedule on our own for lunch or
>whatever.
I'll cert
Bart Lateur wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:00:25 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> >for ( $XL->{Application}->{ActiveSheet} ) {
> > $_->cells(1,1) = "Title";
> > $_->language() = "English";
> >}
> >
> >(presuming lvalue-methods, of course...)
>
> So, in this case, a "with" s
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:00:25 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>> Does such a thing exist already?
>
>A WTDI exists already:
>
>for ( $XL->{Application}->{ActiveSheet} ) {
> $_->cells(1,1) = "Title";
> $_->language() = "English";
>}
>
>(presuming lvalue-methods, of course...)
So, in th
Jeremy Howard wrote:
> with $XL->{Application}->{ActiveSheet} {
> ->cells(1,1) = "Title"
> ->language() = "English"
> }
>
> Does such a thing exist already?
A WTDI exists already:
for ( $XL->{Application}->{ActiveSheet} ) {
$_->cells(1,1) = "Title";
$_->language() =
16 matches
Mail list logo
