On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:37:41PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> > one related point is that this symbol table will be accessible via
> > caller() so you could access/install lexical symbols in a parent block
> > on the call stack. scary!
> >
> > uri
>
> We must demand t
At 03:37 PM 7/16/2001 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
>Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> > one related point is that this symbol table will be accessible via
> > caller() so you could access/install lexical symbols in a parent block
> > on the call stack. scary!
>
>We must demand that the feature come with a wa
Here's a prelim version of the opcode function specification. It's pretty
short, but there's not all that much to it.
I hope to have a working version of the interpreter soonish, by the end of
TPC 5 at least. (It won't *do* much, mind, but it will whiz through an
opcode stream)
Cut here--
Hi,
I'm facing a problem in receiving mails. I'm sending mail in MIME format with
attachments. Now I want to receive this mail on server side & save the attachment
separately with different names.
Kindly help.
Regards,
Priya
Uri Guttman wrote:
> one related point is that this symbol table will be accessible via
> caller() so you could access/install lexical symbols in a parent block
> on the call stack. scary!
Quite. Does anyone have a pointer to tchrist's rant on Tcl's upvar?
--
John Porter
