> Yes but can't the same be accomplished with...
>
> my $myhash = (%{$Request->{Params}});
> print $myhash{abc};
>
> Though again it copies the structure, I don't see how dereferencing can be
> unclear?
]- if u have someting like this anything u can remove in some way is worth
it:))
$tables{
Yes but can't the same be accomplished with...
my $myhash = (%{$Request->{Params}});
print $myhash{abc};
Though again it copies the structure, I don't see how dereferencing can be
unclear?
Ilya
-Original Message-
From: raptor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sterin, Ilya
Sent: 7/13/01 12:24 PM
S
At 09:24 PM 7/13/2001 +0300, raptor wrote:
>in the case of :
> >local *myhash = \%{$Request->{Params}};
>u do this :
>
>print $myhash{abc};
>
>so it is first clearer and second I hope much faster
Clearer maybe, faster probably not appreciably.
Regardless, the lexical 'symbol table' will be
the structure is something like this :
$Request = {
Params => {
abc => 1,
ddd => 2
}
}
the idea is that U don't dereference i.e. :
my $myhash = ($Request->{Params});
if u want to use it U have to do this :
print $$myhash{abc}; #or if u preffer print $myhash
At 03:26 PM 7/13/2001 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:09:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Depending on what you do with them, precision (or, rather,
> > significant digits) is a useful concept for integers as well. Just
> > because you have, for example, an integer w
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:09:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Depending on what you do with them, precision (or, rather,
> significant digits) is a useful concept for integers as well. Just
> because you have, for example, an integer with 43 digits doesn't
> mean that all 43 are actually useful
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:56:25PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > You can always just do this:
> >
> > my Value $foo;
> >
> > And $foo will act like a normal scalar taking anything (your PMAW).
>
> If that's the goal, I'd vote that it
-Original Message-
From: raptor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/13/01 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: nice2haveit
>> Two things i think is good to have it :
>>
>> 1. ALIAS keyword.
>> - first reason is 'cause many people don't know that this is
possible.. at
>
>> Two things i think is good to have it :
>>
>> 1. ALIAS keyword.
>> - first reason is 'cause many people don't know that this is
possible.. at
>> least any newscommer and it will help not to forgot that it exist
:").
>> - Code become more readable.
>> - can be Over
May I infer from the fact that typeglobs are going away that
we will no longer be able to use in our code such lovely global
variables as @31415, %42, the filehandle */, etc? I assume that
the availability of such was merely an unintended side-effect of the
special like-named scalars and the conf
> Two things i think is good to have it :
>
> 1. ALIAS keyword.
> - first reason is 'cause many people don't know that this is possible.. at
> least any newscommer and it will help not to forgot that it exist :").
> - Code become more readable.
> - can be Overloaded
>
hi,
Two things i think is good to have it :
1. ALIAS keyword.
- first reason is 'cause many people don't know that this is possible.. at
least any newscommer and it will help not to forgot that it exist :").
- Code become more readable.
- can be Overloaded
- the syntax for aliasing can becom
12 matches
Mail list logo
